From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Andreas Gr??nbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iomap: Make sure iomap_end is called after iomap_begin
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:32:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200623113204.GA27620@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHpGcM+bCGJMB_k842pr57Ms1VMC6fva++XXaN+aF7rZ2roAvQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:51:00PM +0200, Andreas Gr??nbacher wrote:
> > Yes, it merges the WARN_ONs, and thus reduces their usefulness. How
> > about a patch that just fixes your reported issue insted of messing up
> > other things for no good reason?
>
> So you're saying you prefer this:
>
> + if (WARN_ON(iomap.offset > pos)) {
> + written = -EIO;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (WARN_ON(iomap.length == 0)) {
> + written = -EIO;
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> to this:
>
> + if (WARN_ON(iomap.offset > pos) ||
> + WARN_ON(iomap.length == 0)) {
> + written = -EIO;
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> Well fine, you don't need to accuse me of messing up things for that.
Yes. And we had discussion on exactly that on the previous iteration..
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-23 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-18 12:24 [PATCH v2] iomap: Make sure iomap_end is called after iomap_begin Andreas Gruenbacher
2020-06-18 23:54 ` Dave Chinner
2020-06-19 13:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-22 9:07 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2020-06-23 10:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-23 10:51 ` Andreas Grünbacher
2020-06-23 11:32 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200623113204.GA27620@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=andreas.gruenbacher@gmail.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpeterso@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).