From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: Do not check if there is a fsnotify watcher on pseudo inodes
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:29:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200629152957.GD3183@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f6c8dab-4b54-d523-8636-2b01c03d14d3@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 08:17:02AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 6/16/20 12:47 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Mon 15-06-20 19:26:38, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> >>> This patch changes alloc_file_pseudo() to always opt out of fsnotify by
> >>> setting FMODE_NONOTIFY flag so that no check is made for fsnotify watchers
> >>> on pseudo files. This should be safe as the underlying helper for the
> >>> dentry is d_alloc_pseudo which explicitly states that no lookups are ever
> >>> performed meaning that fanotify should have nothing useful to attach to.
> >>>
> >>> The test motivating this was "perf bench sched messaging --pipe". On
> >>> a single-socket machine using threads the difference of the patch was
> >>> as follows.
> >>>
> >>> 5.7.0 5.7.0
> >>> vanilla nofsnotify-v1r1
> >>> Amean 1 1.3837 ( 0.00%) 1.3547 ( 2.10%)
> >>> Amean 3 3.7360 ( 0.00%) 3.6543 ( 2.19%)
> >>> Amean 5 5.8130 ( 0.00%) 5.7233 * 1.54%*
> >>> Amean 7 8.1490 ( 0.00%) 7.9730 * 2.16%*
> >>> Amean 12 14.6843 ( 0.00%) 14.1820 ( 3.42%)
> >>> Amean 18 21.8840 ( 0.00%) 21.7460 ( 0.63%)
> >>> Amean 24 28.8697 ( 0.00%) 29.1680 ( -1.03%)
> >>> Amean 30 36.0787 ( 0.00%) 35.2640 * 2.26%*
> >>> Amean 32 38.0527 ( 0.00%) 38.1223 ( -0.18%)
> >>>
> >>> The difference is small but in some cases it's outside the noise so
> >>> while marginal, there is still some small benefit to ignoring fsnotify
> >>> for files allocated via alloc_file_pseudo in some cases.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> >
> > Thanks for the patch Mel and for review Amir! I've added the patch to my
> > tree with small amendments to the changelog.
> >
> > Honza
> >
>
> Note this patch broke some user programs (one instance being packetdrill)
>
> Typical legacy packetdrill script has :
>
> // Create a socket and set it to non-blocking.
> 0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
> +0 fcntl(3, F_GETFL) = 0x2 (flags O_RDWR)
> +0 fcntl(3, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 0
>
>
> But after this change, fcntl(3, F_GETFL) returns 0x4000002
>
> FMODE_NONOTIFY was not meant to be visible to user space. (otherwise
> there would be a O_NONOTIFY) ?
>
A revert has been sent because it broke chrome as well. It's not visible
on lkml yet because delivery appears to be delayed there for some unknown
reason.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-29 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-15 12:13 [PATCH v2] fs: Do not check if there is a fsnotify watcher on pseudo inodes Mel Gorman
2020-06-15 16:26 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-06-15 17:25 ` Mel Gorman
2020-06-15 18:32 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-06-16 7:47 ` Jan Kara
2020-06-29 15:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-06-29 15:29 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2020-06-29 18:48 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200629152957.GD3183@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).