From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Wang Long <w@laoqinren.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] xarray: update document for error space returned by xarray normal API
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:03:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200720120310.GV12769@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1595218658-53727-1-git-send-email-w@laoqinren.net>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 12:17:38PM +0800, Wang Long wrote:
> In the current xarray code, the negative value -1 and -4095 represented
> as an error.
>
> xa_is_err(xa_mk_internal(-4095)) and xa_is_err(xa_mk_internal(-1))
> are all return true.
>
> This patch update the document.
There are actually three distinct problems here, but none of them are
fixed by this patch.
The first is that there's no test-suite coverage for this.
The second is that xa_is_err() is checking against -MAX_ERRNO instead of
-1023.
The third is that the documentation isn't clear enough because the line
you're correcting is accurate.
I don't think any of these three problems is terribly urgent to fix.
The second is most important because it could lead to confusion between
an xa_node that happens to be allocated at the top of memory and an
error return, but I don't think there is ever a situation where we end
up checking a node entry for being an error entry. I may be wrong.
The solution to the first problem probably looks like this:
+++ b/lib/test_xarray.c
@@ -81,6 +81,11 @@ static void *xa_store_order(struct xarray *xa, unsigned long index,
static noinline void check_xa_err(struct xarray *xa)
{
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_is_err(xa_mk_internal(0)));
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_is_err(xa_mk_internal(-1)));
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_is_err(xa_mk_internal(-1023)));
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_is_err(xa_mk_internal(-1024)));
+
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_err(xa_store_index(xa, 0, GFP_NOWAIT)) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_err(xa_erase(xa, 0)) != 0);
#ifndef __KERNEL__
> Signed-off-by: Wang Long <w@laoqinren.net>
> ---
> include/linux/xarray.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/xarray.h b/include/linux/xarray.h
> index b4d70e7..0588fb9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/xarray.h
> +++ b/include/linux/xarray.h
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
> * 257: Zero entry
> *
> * Errors are also represented as internal entries, but use the negative
> - * space (-4094 to -2). They're never stored in the slots array; only
> + * space (-4095 to -1). They're never stored in the slots array; only
> * returned by the normal API.
> */
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-20 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-20 4:17 [PATCH v1] xarray: update document for error space returned by xarray normal API Wang Long
2020-07-20 12:03 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200720120310.GV12769@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@laoqinren.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).