From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF4BC433E4 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1BB207BB for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="mqQUMJQM" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728443AbgGUQLr (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2020 12:11:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42054 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726646AbgGUQLr (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2020 12:11:47 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 287A0C061794 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 09:11:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=bH+cUPJPphAqEBb3zIzkTsxg+e1ZZ8w2WzrxoFYs20I=; b=mqQUMJQMRHPwZU9jGFD9yLwVXt gA+Qf3MYzpYR0W5hCTVtFyTjSaCmlXDII9p7F9VEPxsIzMeWudj0FjVbkR9EoC85OFo2cLOzNV8pS Af5hFb4xrHZr9g6gJZFwl5R/wOlfeENzRVt/uaez/CVc8dCVsYabhrxb/RifEmqDF8gUVyja8W4Mq NZqRdEeDEzza5HgJAKoNQT/cJDIKoEd9TIxT/xJLL0c+IY4rSoPZX2aQwsMEcJo3Qf4NQx3WTgnvl 30G71smV6YsPIRqhnE7fgE/EHKp+7cs6kVHZt1yHneBP5M8kNqSOoF/Oc1T/NNbm9P9U/tvEBm8yv uv43wGvg==; Received: from hch by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jxurm-0006Vs-LR; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:11:42 +0000 Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:11:42 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Johannes Thumshirn Cc: Damien Le Moal , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] zonefs: update documentation to reflect zone size vs capacity Message-ID: <20200721161142.GB24880@infradead.org> References: <20200721121027.23451-1-johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> <20200721121027.23451-3-johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200721121027.23451-3-johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:10:27PM +0900, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > Update the zonefs documentation to reflect the difference between a zone's > size and it's capacity. > > The maximum file size in zonefs is the zones capacity, for ZBC and ZAC > based devices, which do not have a separate zone capacity, the zone > capacity is equal to the zone size. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig