From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=LTup=BN=vger.kernel.org=linux-fsdevel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B039C433DF
	for <linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon,  3 Aug 2020 22:19:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643FD20775
	for <linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon,  3 Aug 2020 22:19:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1728298AbgHCWTR (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 3 Aug 2020 18:19:17 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49116 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1726693AbgHCWTR (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 3 Aug 2020 18:19:17 -0400
Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2002:c35c:fd02::1])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CE46C06174A;
        Mon,  3 Aug 2020 15:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux))
        id 1k2inG-008hFR-8F; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 22:18:54 +0000
Date:   Mon, 3 Aug 2020 23:18:54 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
        Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@google.com>,
        Ioannis Ilkos <ilkos@google.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Add fd_install file operation
Message-ID: <20200803221854.GH1236603@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20200803144719.3184138-1-kaleshsingh@google.com>
 <20200803144719.3184138-2-kaleshsingh@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200803144719.3184138-2-kaleshsingh@google.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:47:18PM +0000, Kalesh Singh wrote:
> Provides a per process hook for the acquisition of file descriptors,
> despite the method used to obtain the descriptor.

No, with the side of Fuck, No.

Driver has no possible reason to watch know the descriptors involved.
Moreover, it has no possible way to track that information _and_
no locking that could make that viable.

NAKed with extreme prejudice - never bring that idea back.