From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D9FC433E0 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A9E20748 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="hJM2otlY" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726815AbgHJNI0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:08:26 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:42755 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726330AbgHJNIZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:08:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1597064904; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pbpPyMxeUTZufAlT4TB0KbZ9dM5w1NZ9B6YwnpXi1/s=; b=hJM2otlYUoPY7VxeCg+9S/SuDdXK/EMb63r95YBavEpwFYYx2bHe7xw5vabFMzkA9bv3aG GO+rnV5h9LFmhpGEzzGShn29p21HXvBnVGFrRX+y6S4jLgkre3rLGiwT2g0SAsWo7octz4 xzEhTG6JX1B3/EzsojREJRmGfBPmSv8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-98-bwrUS9gAOm6o0zWQN2BguA-1; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:08:21 -0400 X-MC-Unique: bwrUS9gAOm6o0zWQN2BguA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B63918A0F03; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from horse.redhat.com (unknown [10.10.115.251]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EAE10013C2; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by horse.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 10451) id 3286022036A; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:08:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:08:09 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal To: Miklos Szeredi , Dan Williams , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtio-fs-list , Stefan Hajnoczi , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] virtiofs: Add DAX support Message-ID: <20200810130809.GA455528@redhat.com> References: <20200807195526.426056-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 09:29:47AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:55 PM Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > > > Most of the changes are limited to fuse/virtiofs. There are couple > > of changes needed in generic dax infrastructure and couple of changes > > in virtio to be able to access shared memory region. > > So what's the plan for merging the different subsystems? I can take > all that into the fuse tree, but would need ACKs from the respective > maintainers. I am assuming for DAX patches we need ACK from Dan Williams and for virtio patches we need ack from Michael S. Tsirkin. Dan, Michael, can you please review the dax and virtio patches respectively and if there are no concerns, please provide ACK. Or suggest an alternative way of how these patches can be merged. Thanks Vivek