From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
"linux-btrfs @ vger . kernel . org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] btrfs: don't call btrfs_sync_file from iomap context
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:44:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200902114414.GX14765@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200901235830.GI12096@dread.disaster.area>
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 09:58:30AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Put simply: converting a filesystem to use iomap is not a "change
> the filesystem interfacing code and it will work" modification. We
> ask that filesystems are modified to conform to the iomap IO
> exclusion model; adding special cases for every potential
> locking and mapping quirk every different filesystem has is part of
> what turned the old direct IO code into an unmaintainable nightmare.
>
> > That's fine, but this is kind of a bad way to find
> > out. We really shouldn't have generic helper's that have different generic
> > locking rules based on which file system uses them.
>
> We certainly can change the rules for new infrastructure. Indeed, we
> had to change the rules to support DAX. The whole point of the
> iomap infrastructure was that it enabled us to use code that already
> worked for DAX (the XFS code) in multiple filesystems. And as people
> have realised that the DIO via iomap is much faster than the old DIO
> code and is a much more efficient way of doing large buffered IO,
> other filesystems have started to use it.
>
> However....
>
> > Because then we end up
> > with situations like this, where suddenly we're having to come up with some
> > weird solution because the generic thing only works for a subset of file
> > systems. Thanks,
>
> .... we've always said "you need to change the filesystem code to
> use iomap". This is simply a reflection on the fact that iomap has
> different rules and constraints to the old code and so it's not a
> direct plug in replacement. There are no short cuts here...
Can you point me (and I suspect Josef!) towards the documentation of the
locking model? I was hoping to find Documentation/filesystems/iomap.rst
but all the 'iomap' strings in Documentation/ refer to pci_iomap and
similar, except for this in the DAX documentation:
: - implementing ->read_iter and ->write_iter operations which use dax_iomap_rw()
: when inode has S_DAX flag set
: - implementing an mmap file operation for DAX files which sets the
: VM_MIXEDMAP and VM_HUGEPAGE flags on the VMA, and setting the vm_ops to
: include handlers for fault, pmd_fault, page_mkwrite, pfn_mkwrite. These
: handlers should probably call dax_iomap_fault() passing the appropriate
: fault size and iomap operations.
: - calling iomap_zero_range() passing appropriate iomap operations instead of
: block_truncate_page() for DAX files
: - ensuring that there is sufficient locking between reads, writes,
: truncates and page faults
:
: The iomap handlers for allocating blocks must make sure that allocated blocks
: are zeroed out and converted to written extents before being returned to avoid
: exposure of uninitialized data through mmap.
which doesn't bear on this situation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-02 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200901130644.12655-1-johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
2020-09-01 15:11 ` [RFC PATCH] btrfs: don't call btrfs_sync_file from iomap context Josef Bacik
2020-09-01 17:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-01 17:55 ` Josef Bacik
2020-09-01 21:46 ` Dave Chinner
2020-09-01 22:19 ` Josef Bacik
2020-09-01 23:58 ` Dave Chinner
2020-09-02 0:22 ` Josef Bacik
2020-09-02 7:12 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-09-02 11:10 ` Josef Bacik
2020-09-02 16:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-02 16:47 ` Josef Bacik
2020-09-02 11:44 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-09-02 12:20 ` Dave Chinner
2020-09-02 12:42 ` Josef Bacik
2020-09-03 2:28 ` Dave Chinner
2020-09-03 9:49 ` Filipe Manana
2020-09-03 16:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 16:46 ` Josef Bacik
2020-09-07 0:04 ` Dave Chinner
2020-09-15 21:48 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-09-17 3:09 ` Dave Chinner
2020-09-17 5:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 6:29 ` Dave Chinner
2020-09-17 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200902114414.GX14765@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox