From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 08/16] ceph: implement -o test_dummy_encryption mount option
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:23:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200915012307.GH899@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200914191707.380444-9-jlayton@kernel.org>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:16:59PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> + case Opt_test_dummy_encryption:
> + kfree(fsopt->test_dummy_encryption);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION
> + fsopt->test_dummy_encryption = param->string;
> + param->string = NULL;
> + fsopt->flags |= CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_TEST_DUMMY_ENC;
> +#else
> + warnfc(fc, "FS encryption not supported: test_dummy_encryption mount option ignored");
> +#endif
Seems that the kfree() should go in the CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION=y block.
Also, is there much reason to have the CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_TEST_DUMMY_ENC flag
instead of just checking fsopt->test_dummy_encryption != NULL?
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION
> +static int ceph_set_test_dummy_encryption(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc,
> + struct ceph_mount_options *fsopt)
> +{
> + struct ceph_fs_client *fsc = sb->s_fs_info;
> +
> + if (fsopt->flags & CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_TEST_DUMMY_ENC) {
> + substring_t arg = { };
> +
> + /*
> + * No changing encryption context on remount. Note that
> + * fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption will validate the version
> + * string passed in (if any).
> + */
> + if (fc->purpose == FS_CONTEXT_FOR_RECONFIGURE && !fsc->dummy_enc_policy.policy)
> + return -EEXIST;
Maybe show an error message here, with errorfc()?
See the message that ext4_set_test_dummy_encryption() shows.
> +
> + /* Ewwwwwwww */
> + if (fsc->mount_options->test_dummy_encryption) {
> + arg.from = fsc->mount_options->test_dummy_encryption;
> + arg.to = arg.from + strlen(arg.from) - 1;
> + }
We should probably make fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption() take a
'const char *' to avoid having to create a substring_t here.
> + return fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption(sb, &arg, &fsc->dummy_enc_policy);
Likewise, maybe show an error message if this fails.
> + } else {
> + if (fc->purpose == FS_CONTEXT_FOR_RECONFIGURE && fsc->dummy_enc_policy.policy)
> + return -EEXIST;
If remount on ceph behaves as "don't change options that aren't specified",
similar to ext4, then there's no need for this hunk here.
> static int ceph_reconfigure_fc(struct fs_context *fc)
> {
> + int err;
> struct ceph_parse_opts_ctx *pctx = fc->fs_private;
> struct ceph_mount_options *fsopt = pctx->opts;
> - struct ceph_fs_client *fsc = ceph_sb_to_client(fc->root->d_sb);
> + struct super_block *sb = fc->root->d_sb;
> + struct ceph_fs_client *fsc = ceph_sb_to_client(sb);
>
> if (fsopt->flags & CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_ASYNC_DIROPS)
> ceph_set_mount_opt(fsc, ASYNC_DIROPS);
> else
> ceph_clear_mount_opt(fsc, ASYNC_DIROPS);
>
> - sync_filesystem(fc->root->d_sb);
> + err = ceph_set_test_dummy_encryption(sb, fc, fsopt);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + sync_filesystem(sb);
> return 0;
> }
Seems that ceph_set_test_dummy_encryption() should go at the beginning, since
otherwise it can fail after something was already changed.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-15 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-14 19:16 [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] ceph+fscrypt: context, filename and symlink support Jeff Layton
2020-09-14 19:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/16] vfs: export new_inode_pseudo Jeff Layton
2020-09-14 23:33 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-23 3:41 ` Al Viro
2020-09-23 11:19 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-14 19:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/16] fscrypt: export fscrypt_base64_encode and fscrypt_base64_decode Jeff Layton
2020-09-14 23:44 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-14 19:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/16] fscrypt: export fscrypt_d_revalidate Jeff Layton
2020-09-15 0:04 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-14 19:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/16] fscrypt: add fscrypt_context_for_new_inode Jeff Layton
2020-09-15 0:15 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-14 19:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/16] fscrypt: make fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr return whether result is nokey name Jeff Layton
2020-09-15 0:23 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-14 19:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/16] ceph: add fscrypt ioctls Jeff Layton
2020-09-15 0:45 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-15 12:08 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-14 19:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/16] ceph: crypto context handling for ceph Jeff Layton
2020-09-15 1:00 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-14 19:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/16] ceph: implement -o test_dummy_encryption mount option Jeff Layton
2020-09-15 1:23 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2020-09-16 12:49 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-14 19:17 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/16] ceph: preallocate inode for ops that may create one Jeff Layton
2020-09-15 1:30 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-16 12:41 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-14 19:17 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/16] ceph: add routine to create context prior to RPC Jeff Layton
2020-09-15 1:37 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-16 12:18 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-14 19:17 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/16] ceph: make ceph_msdc_build_path use ref-walk Jeff Layton
2020-09-14 19:17 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/16] ceph: add encrypted fname handling to ceph_mdsc_build_path Jeff Layton
2020-09-15 1:41 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-16 12:30 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-16 17:36 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-16 18:04 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-16 18:42 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-14 19:17 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/16] ceph: make d_revalidate call fscrypt revalidator for encrypted dentries Jeff Layton
2020-09-14 19:17 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/16] ceph: add support to readdir for encrypted filenames Jeff Layton
2020-09-15 1:57 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-15 13:27 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-15 20:40 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-16 12:16 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-14 19:17 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/16] ceph: add fscrypt support to ceph_fill_trace Jeff Layton
2020-09-14 19:17 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/16] ceph: create symlinks with encrypted and base64-encoded targets Jeff Layton
2020-09-15 2:07 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-15 14:05 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-15 20:49 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-16 12:15 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-15 2:13 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] ceph+fscrypt: context, filename and symlink support Eric Biggers
2020-09-15 13:38 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200915012307.GH899@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).