linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.8 02/29] vboxsf: Fix the check for the old binary mount-arguments struct
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 21:29:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200929013027.2406344-2-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200929013027.2406344-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 9d682ea6bcc76b8b2691c79add59f7d99c881635 ]

Fix the check for the mainline vboxsf code being used with the old
mount.vboxsf mount binary from the out-of-tree vboxsf version doing
a comparison between signed and unsigned data types.

This fixes the following smatch warnings:

fs/vboxsf/super.c:390 vboxsf_parse_monolithic() warn: impossible condition '(options[1] == (255)) => ((-128)-127 == 255)'
fs/vboxsf/super.c:391 vboxsf_parse_monolithic() warn: impossible condition '(options[2] == (254)) => ((-128)-127 == 254)'
fs/vboxsf/super.c:392 vboxsf_parse_monolithic() warn: impossible condition '(options[3] == (253)) => ((-128)-127 == 253)'

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/vboxsf/super.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/vboxsf/super.c b/fs/vboxsf/super.c
index 8fe03b4a0d2b0..25aade3441922 100644
--- a/fs/vboxsf/super.c
+++ b/fs/vboxsf/super.c
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ static int vboxsf_setup(void)
 
 static int vboxsf_parse_monolithic(struct fs_context *fc, void *data)
 {
-	char *options = data;
+	unsigned char *options = data;
 
 	if (options && options[0] == VBSF_MOUNT_SIGNATURE_BYTE_0 &&
 		       options[1] == VBSF_MOUNT_SIGNATURE_BYTE_1 &&
-- 
2.25.1


       reply	other threads:[~2020-09-29  1:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200929013027.2406344-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2020-09-29  1:29 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2020-09-29  1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.8 15/29] fuse: fix the ->direct_IO() treatment of iov_iter Sasha Levin
2020-09-29  1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.8 22/29] io_uring: mark statx/files_update/epoll_ctl as non-SQPOLL Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200929013027.2406344-2-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).