linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, miklos@szeredi.hu
Cc: vgoyal@redhat.com, virtio-fs@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/6] fuse: Don't send ATTR_MODE to kill suid/sgid for handle_killpriv_v2
Date: Fri,  9 Oct 2020 14:15:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201009181512.65496-5-vgoyal@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201009181512.65496-1-vgoyal@redhat.com>

If client does a write() on a suid/sgid file, VFS will first call
fuse_setattr() with ATTR_KILL_S[UG]ID set. This requires sending
setattr to file server with ATTR_MODE set to kill suid/sgid. But
to do that client needs to know latest mode otherwise it is racy.

To reduce the race window, current code first call fuse_do_getattr()
to get latest ->i_mode and then resets suid/sgid bits and sends rest
to server with setattr(ATTR_MODE). This does not reduce the race
completely but narrows race window significantly.

With fc->handle_killpriv_v2 enabled, it should be possible to remove
this race completely. Do not kill suid/sgid with ATTR_MODE at all. It
will be killed by server when WRITE request is sent to server soon.
This is similar to fc->handle_killpriv logic. V2 is just more refined
version of protocol. Hence this patch does not send ATTR_MODE to
kill suid/sgid if fc->handle_killpriv_v2 is enabled.

This creates an issue if fc->writeback_cache is enabled. In that
case WRITE can be cached in guest and server might not see WRITE
request and hence will not kill suid/sgid. Miklos suggested that
in such cases, we should fallback to a writethrough WRITE instead
and that will generate WRITE request and kill suid/sgid. This patch
implements that too.

But this relies on client seeing the suid/sgid set. If another client
sets suid/sgid and this client does not see it immideately, then we
will not fallback to writethrough WRITE. So this is one limitation
with both fc->handle_killpriv_v2 and fc->writeback_cache enabled.
Both the options are not fully compatible. But might be good enough
for many use cases.

Note: I am not checking whether security.capability is set or not when
      falling back to writethrough path. if suid/sgid is not set and only
      security.capability is set, that will be taken care of by
      file_remove_privs() call in ->writeback_cache path.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
 fs/fuse/dir.c  | 2 +-
 fs/fuse/file.c | 9 ++++++++-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c
index ecdb7895c156..510178594a8d 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
@@ -1664,7 +1664,7 @@ static int fuse_setattr(struct dentry *entry, struct iattr *attr)
 		 *
 		 * This should be done on write(), truncate() and chown().
 		 */
-		if (!fc->handle_killpriv) {
+		if (!fc->handle_killpriv && !fc->handle_killpriv_v2) {
 			/*
 			 * ia_mode calculation may have used stale i_mode.
 			 * Refresh and recalculate.
diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index e40428f3d0f1..ee1bb9bfdcd5 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -1260,17 +1260,24 @@ static ssize_t fuse_cache_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 	ssize_t written_buffered = 0;
 	struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
 	ssize_t err;
+	struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
 	loff_t endbyte = 0;
 
-	if (get_fuse_conn(inode)->writeback_cache) {
+	if (fc->writeback_cache) {
 		/* Update size (EOF optimization) and mode (SUID clearing) */
 		err = fuse_update_attributes(mapping->host, file);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 
+		if (fc->handle_killpriv_v2 &&
+		    should_remove_suid(file_dentry(file))) {
+			goto writethrough;
+		}
+
 		return generic_file_write_iter(iocb, from);
 	}
 
+writethrough:
 	inode_lock(inode);
 
 	/* We can write back this queue in page reclaim */
-- 
2.25.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-09 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-09 18:15 [PATCH v3 0/6] fuse: Implement FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 and enable SB_NOSEC Vivek Goyal
2020-10-09 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] fuse: Introduce the notion of FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 Vivek Goyal
2020-10-09 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] fuse: Set FUSE_WRITE_KILL_PRIV in cached write path Vivek Goyal
2020-10-09 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] fuse: setattr should set FATTR_KILL_PRIV upon size change Vivek Goyal
2020-11-06 14:39   ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-11-06 17:18     ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-11 13:54       ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-11-11 16:24         ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-11-11 22:09           ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-11 19:16         ` Vivek Goyal
2020-10-09 18:15 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2020-10-09 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] fuse: Add a flag FUSE_OPEN_KILL_PRIV for open() request Vivek Goyal
2020-11-06 13:55   ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-11-06 16:00     ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-06 16:33       ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-11-06 18:41         ` Vivek Goyal
2020-10-09 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] fuse: Support SB_NOSEC flag to improve direct write performance Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201009181512.65496-5-vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).