From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB36BC433E7 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC0620848 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726605AbgJOSXh (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2020 14:23:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37168 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726152AbgJOSXg (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2020 14:23:36 -0400 Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2002:c35c:fd02::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92014C061755 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 11:23:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kT7uY-001463-5d; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:23:34 +0000 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 19:23:34 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Clean up kernel_read/kernel_write Message-ID: <20201015182334.GQ3576660@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20201003025534.21045-1-willy@infradead.org> <20201015175641.GC23287@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201015175641.GC23287@lst.de> Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 07:56:41PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Al, > > can you pick up patches 1 and 2 to unbreak linux-next? OK... I really don't like the idea of mangling base.set_fs, so a bit of bisect hazard will be there - I'd put these two into a branch on top of base.set_fs (#work.set_fs). Regenerated with addition of your reviewed-by, added to #for-next and pushed out.