From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: support partial page discard on writeback block mapping failure
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:32:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201028113200.GC1610972@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201028073127.GA32068@infradead.org>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 07:31:27AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > if (unlikely(error)) {
> > + unsigned int pageoff = offset_in_page(file_offset);
> > + /*
> > + * Let the filesystem know what portion of the current page
> > + * failed to map. If the page wasn't been added to ioend, it
> > + * won't be affected by I/O completion and we must unlock it
> > + * now.
> > + */
> > + if (wpc->ops->discard_page)
> > + wpc->ops->discard_page(page, pageoff);
>
> I don't think we need the pageoff variable here. Also it would
> seem more natural to pass the full file_offset offset instead of
> having to recreate it in the file system.
>
I used the variable just to avoid having to split the function call into
multiple lines. I.e., it just looked more readable to me than:
if (wpc->ops->discard_page)
wpc->ops->discard_page(page,
offset_in_page(file_offset));
I can change it back if that is preferred (or possibly use a function
pointer variable instead). I suppose that's also avoided by passing
file_offset directly, but that seems a little odd to me for a page
oriented callback.
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-29 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-26 18:20 [PATCH] iomap: support partial page discard on writeback block mapping failure Brian Foster
2020-10-27 16:47 ` Brian Foster
2020-10-28 7:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-28 11:32 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2020-10-28 14:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-28 14:15 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201028113200.GC1610972@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).