linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] fuse: setattr should set FATTR_KILL_PRIV upon size change
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 12:18:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201106171843.GA1445528@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegu=ooDmc3hT9cOe2WEUHQN=twX01xbV+YfPQPJUHFMs-g@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 03:39:29PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 8:16 PM Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > If fc->handle_killpriv_v2 is enabled, we expect file server to clear
> > suid/sgid/security.capbility upon chown/truncate/write as appropriate.
> >
> > Upon truncate (ATTR_SIZE), suid/sgid is cleared only if caller does
> > not have CAP_FSETID. File server does not know whether caller has
> > CAP_FSETID or not. Hence set FATTR_KILL_PRIV upon truncate to let
> > file server know that caller does not have CAP_FSETID and it should
> > kill suid/sgid as appropriate.
> >
> > We don't have to send this information for chown (ATTR_UID/ATTR_GID)
> > as that always clears suid/sgid irrespective of capabilities of
> > calling process.
> 
> I'm  undecided on this.   Would it hurt to set it on chown?  That
> might make the logic in some servers simpler, no?
> 
> What would be the drawback of setting FATTR_KILL_PRIV for chown as well?

Hi Miklos,

Thinking loud.

So these are the rules we expect from VFS point of view.

- caps are always cleared on chown/write/truncate
- suid is always cleared on chown, while for truncate/write it is cleared
  only if caller does not have CAP_FSETID.
- sgid is always cleared on chown, while for truncate/write it is cleared
  only if caller does not have CAP_FSETID as well as file has group execute
  permission.

From server point of view, these rules become.

- caps are always cleared on chown/write/truncate
- suid is always cleared on chown, while for truncate/write it is cleared
  only if client set appropriate flag.
  	- For truncate, this flag will either be FUSE_OPEN_KILL_PRIV or
	  FATTR_KILL_PRIV.
	- For write, FUSE_WRITE_KILL_PRIV will be set.
- sgid is always cleared on chown, while for truncate/write it is cleared
  only if caller has set a flag as well as file has group execute permission.
  	- For truncate, this flag will either be FUSE_OPEN_KILL_PRIV or
	  FATTR_KILL_PRIV.
	- For write, FUSE_WRITE_KILL_PRIV will be set.

Above rules assumes that chown() will always clear caps/suid/sgid and
server does not have to rely on any flags.

I think it does not hurt to start passing FATTR_KILL_PRIV for chown()
as well. In that case, server will always clear caps on chown but
clear suid/sgid only if FATTR_KILL_PRIV is set. (Which will always
be set).

So anything is fine. We just need to document it well. I think I will
write it very clearly in qemu patch depending on what goes in kernel.

Thanks
Vivek


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-06 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-09 18:15 [PATCH v3 0/6] fuse: Implement FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 and enable SB_NOSEC Vivek Goyal
2020-10-09 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] fuse: Introduce the notion of FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 Vivek Goyal
2020-10-09 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] fuse: Set FUSE_WRITE_KILL_PRIV in cached write path Vivek Goyal
2020-10-09 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] fuse: setattr should set FATTR_KILL_PRIV upon size change Vivek Goyal
2020-11-06 14:39   ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-11-06 17:18     ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2020-11-11 13:54       ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-11-11 16:24         ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-11-11 22:09           ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-11 19:16         ` Vivek Goyal
2020-10-09 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] fuse: Don't send ATTR_MODE to kill suid/sgid for handle_killpriv_v2 Vivek Goyal
2020-10-09 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] fuse: Add a flag FUSE_OPEN_KILL_PRIV for open() request Vivek Goyal
2020-11-06 13:55   ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-11-06 16:00     ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-06 16:33       ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-11-06 18:41         ` Vivek Goyal
2020-10-09 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] fuse: Support SB_NOSEC flag to improve direct write performance Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201106171843.GA1445528@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).