From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DECC63697 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:58:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3133241A5 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726924AbgKRI6I (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:58:08 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:34517 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726775AbgKRI6I (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:58:08 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id E406367357; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:58:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:58:04 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jan Beulich Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Tejun Heo , Josef Bacik , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Coly Li , Mike Snitzer , dm-devel@redhat.com, Richard Weinberger , Jan Kara , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Jens Axboe Subject: Re: merge struct block_device and struct hd_struct Message-ID: <20201118085804.GA20384@lst.de> References: <20201118084800.2339180-1-hch@lst.de> <22ca5396-0253-f286-9eab-d417b2e0b3ad@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <22ca5396-0253-f286-9eab-d417b2e0b3ad@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 09:56:11AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > since this isn't the first series from you recently spamming > xen-devel, may I ask that you don't Cc entire series to lists > which are involved with perhaps just one out of the many patches? > IMO Cc lists should be compiled on a per-patch basis; the cover > letter may of course be sent to the union of all of them. No way. Individual CCs are completely broken as they don't provide the reviewer a context. If you don't want xen-blkfront patches to go to xen-devel remove it from MAINTAINERS.