From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "Paweł Jasiak" <pawel@jasiak.xyz>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Brian Gerst" <brgerst@gmail.com>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: fanotify_mark EFAULT on x86
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:20:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201124102033.GA19336@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201124084507.GA4009@zn.tnic>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2393 bytes --]
On Tue 24-11-20 09:45:07, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 11:46:51PM +0100, Paweł Jasiak wrote:
> > On 23/11/20, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > OK, with a help of Boris Petkov I think I have a fix that looks correct
> > > (attach). Can you please try whether it works for you? Thanks!
> >
> > Unfortunately I am getting a linker error.
> >
> > ld: arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.o:(.rodata+0x54c): undefined reference to `__ia32_sys_ia32_fanotify_mark'
>
> Because CONFIG_COMPAT is not set in your .config.
>
> Jan, look at 121b32a58a3a and especially this hunk
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> index 9b294c13809a..b8f89f78b8cd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ obj-y += setup.o x86_init.o i8259.o irqinit.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL) += jump_label.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_WORK) += irq_work.o
> obj-y += probe_roms.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += sys_ia32.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION) += sys_ia32.o
>
> how it enables the ia32 syscalls depending on those config items. Now,
> you have
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> -COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE6(fanotify_mark,
> +SYSCALL_DEFINE6(ia32_fanotify_mark,
>
> which is under CONFIG_COMPAT which is not set in Paweł's config.
>
> config COMPAT
> def_bool y
> depends on IA32_EMULATION || X86_X32
>
> but it depends on those two config items.
>
> However, it looks to me like ia32_fanotify_mark's definition should be
> simply under CONFIG_X86_32 because:
>
> IA32_EMULATION is 32-bit emulation on 64-bit kernels
> X86_X32 is for the x32 ABI
Thanks for checking! I didn't realize I needed to change the ifdefs as well
(I missed that bit in 121b32a58a3a). So do I understand correctly that
whenever the kernel is 64-bit, 64-bit syscall args (e.g. defined as u64) are
passed just fine regardless of whether the userspace is 32-bit or not?
Also how about other 32-bit archs? Because I now realized that
CONFIG_COMPAT as well as the COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE6() is also utilized by
other 32-bit archs (I can see a reference to compat_sys_fanotify_mark e.g.
in sparc, powerpc, and other args). So I probably need to actually keep
that for other archs but do the modification only for x86, don't I?
So something like attached patch?
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-fanotify-Fix-fanotify_mark-on-32-bit-x86.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2492 bytes --]
From 20d2ddf37c01e91ca18d415a59b3488a394acd8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 17:37:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fanotify: Fix fanotify_mark() on 32-bit x86
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Commit converting syscalls taking 64-bit arguments to new scheme of compat
handlers omitted converting fanotify_mark(2) which then broke the
syscall for 32-bit x86 builds. Add missed conversion. It is somewhat
cumbersome since we need to keep the original compat handler for all the
other 32-bit archs.
CC: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reported-by: Paweł Jasiak <pawel@jasiak.xyz>
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Fixes: 121b32a58a3a ("x86/entry/32: Use IA32-specific wrappers for syscalls taking 64-bit arguments")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 2 +-
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
index 0d0667a9fbd7..b2ec6ff88307 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@
336 i386 perf_event_open sys_perf_event_open
337 i386 recvmmsg sys_recvmmsg_time32 compat_sys_recvmmsg_time32
338 i386 fanotify_init sys_fanotify_init
-339 i386 fanotify_mark sys_fanotify_mark compat_sys_fanotify_mark
+339 i386 fanotify_mark sys_ia32_fanotify_mark
340 i386 prlimit64 sys_prlimit64
341 i386 name_to_handle_at sys_name_to_handle_at
342 i386 open_by_handle_at sys_open_by_handle_at compat_sys_open_by_handle_at
diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
index 3e01d8f2ab90..54a36d4bd116 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
@@ -1292,8 +1292,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(fanotify_mark, int, fanotify_fd, unsigned int, flags,
return do_fanotify_mark(fanotify_fd, flags, mask, dfd, pathname);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+#if defined(CONFIG_COMPAT) || defined(CONFIG_X86_32)
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+SYSCALL_DEFINE6(ia32_fanotify_mark,
+#elif CONFIG_COMPAT
COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE6(fanotify_mark,
+#endif
int, fanotify_fd, unsigned int, flags,
__u32, mask0, __u32, mask1, int, dfd,
const char __user *, pathname)
--
2.16.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-24 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-01 21:27 PROBLEM: fanotify_mark EFAULT on x86 Paweł Jasiak
2020-11-01 21:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-01 22:27 ` Paweł Jasiak
2020-11-02 12:26 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-02 17:16 ` Paweł Jasiak
2020-11-03 21:17 ` Paweł Jasiak
2020-11-04 10:14 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-23 16:46 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-23 22:46 ` Paweł Jasiak
2020-11-24 8:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:20 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2020-11-24 10:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-26 10:48 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-26 10:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-25 19:31 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-11-26 10:48 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-23 23:07 ` [PATCH] fanotify: Fix fanotify_mark() on 32-bit archs kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201124102033.GA19336@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pawel@jasiak.xyz \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).