From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: add bio_iov_iter_nvecs for figuring out nr_vecs
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:50:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201208015030.GC1059392@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3eb1020d-c336-dbe6-d75e-70c388464e6e@gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:07:39PM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 01/12/2020 12:06, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Pavel reported that iov_iter_npages is a bit heavy in case of bvec
> > iter.
> >
> > Turns out it isn't necessary to iterate every page in the bvec iter,
> > and we call iov_iter_npages() just for figuring out how many bio
> > vecs need to be allocated. And we can simply map each vector in bvec iter
> > to bio's vec, so just return iter->nr_segs from bio_iov_iter_nvecs() for
> > bvec iter.
> >
> > Also rename local variable 'nr_pages' as 'nr_vecs' which exactly matches its
> > real usage.
> >
> > This patch is based on Mathew's post:
>
> Tried this, the system didn't boot + discovered a filesystem blowned after
> booting with a stable kernel. That's on top of 4498a8536c816 ("block: use
> an xarray for disk->part_tbl"), which works fine. Ideas?
I guess it is caused by Christoph's "store a pointer to the block_device in struct bio (again)"
which has been reverted in for-5.11/block.
I'd suggest to run your test against the latest for-5.11/block one more time.
thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-08 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-01 12:06 [PATCH] block: add bio_iov_iter_nvecs for figuring out nr_vecs Ming Lei
2020-12-01 12:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-12-01 12:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 13:17 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-01 13:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 13:36 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-01 13:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 13:48 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-02 2:10 ` Ming Lei
2020-12-02 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-03 22:36 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-03 23:43 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-04 12:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-10 13:18 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-11 13:22 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-02 1:46 ` Ming Lei
2020-12-02 14:06 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-02 15:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02 16:56 ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-07 18:07 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-08 1:21 ` Ming Lei
2020-12-08 1:50 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-12-08 2:54 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201208015030.GC1059392@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).