linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: darrick.wong@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org,
	david@fromorbit.com, hch@infradead.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	jlayton@redhat.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [PATCH v13 4/4] xfs: use current->journal_info to avoid transaction reservation recursion
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:11:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201217011157.92549-5-laoar.shao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201217011157.92549-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>

PF_FSTRANS which is used to avoid transaction reservation recursion, is
dropped since commit 9070733b4efa ("xfs: abstract PF_FSTRANS to
PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS") and replaced by PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS which means to avoid
filesystem reclaim recursion.

As these two flags have different meanings, we'd better reintroduce
PF_FSTRANS back. To avoid wasting the space of PF_* flags in task_struct,
we can reuse the current->journal_info to do that, per Willy. As the
check of transaction reservation recursion is used by XFS only, we can
move the check into xfs_vm_writepage(s), per Dave.

Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c |  7 -------
 fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c      | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h     | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index 10cc7979ce38..3c53fa6ce64d 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -1458,13 +1458,6 @@ iomap_do_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc, void *data)
 			PF_MEMALLOC))
 		goto redirty;
 
-	/*
-	 * Given that we do not allow direct reclaim to call us, we should
-	 * never be called in a recursive filesystem reclaim context.
-	 */
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS))
-		goto redirty;
-
 	/*
 	 * Is this page beyond the end of the file?
 	 *
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
index 2371187b7615..0da0242d42c3 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
@@ -568,6 +568,16 @@ xfs_vm_writepage(
 {
 	struct xfs_writepage_ctx wpc = { };
 
+	/*
+	 * Given that we do not allow direct reclaim to call us, we should
+	 * never be called while in a filesystem transaction.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(xfs_trans_context_active())) {
+		redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
+		unlock_page(page);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	return iomap_writepage(page, wbc, &wpc.ctx, &xfs_writeback_ops);
 }
 
@@ -579,6 +589,13 @@ xfs_vm_writepages(
 	struct xfs_writepage_ctx wpc = { };
 
 	xfs_iflags_clear(XFS_I(mapping->host), XFS_ITRUNCATED);
+	/*
+	 * Given that we do not allow direct reclaim to call us, we should
+	 * never be called while in a filesystem transaction.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(xfs_trans_context_active()))
+		return 0;
+
 	return iomap_writepages(mapping, wbc, &wpc.ctx, &xfs_writeback_ops);
 }
 
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
index 12380eaaf7ce..0c8140147b9b 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
@@ -268,29 +268,41 @@ xfs_trans_item_relog(
 	return lip->li_ops->iop_relog(lip, tp);
 }
 
+static inline bool
+xfs_trans_context_active(void)
+{
+	/* Use journal_info to indicate current is in a transaction */
+	return current->journal_info != NULL;
+}
+
 static inline void
 xfs_trans_context_set(struct xfs_trans *tp)
 {
+	ASSERT(!current->journal_info);
+	current->journal_info = tp;
 	tp->t_pflags = memalloc_nofs_save();
 }
 
 static inline void
 xfs_trans_context_clear(struct xfs_trans *tp)
 {
+	/*
+	 * If xfs_trans_context_swap() handed the NOFS context to a
+	 * new transaction we do not clear the context here.
+	 */
+	if (current->journal_info != tp)
+		return;
+
+	current->journal_info = NULL;
 	memalloc_nofs_restore(tp->t_pflags);
 }
 
 static inline void
 xfs_trans_context_swap(struct xfs_trans *tp, struct xfs_trans *ntp)
 {
+	ASSERT(current->journal_info == tp);
+	current->journal_info = ntp;
 	ntp->t_pflags = tp->t_pflags;
-	/*
-	 * For the rolling transaction, we have to set NOFS in the old
-	 * transaction's t_pflags so that when we clear the context on
-	 * the old transaction we don't actually change the thread's NOFS
-	 * state.
-	 */
-	tp->t_pflags = current->flags | PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS;
 }
 
 #endif	/* __XFS_TRANS_H__ */
-- 
2.18.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-17  1:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-17  1:11 [PATCH v13 0/4] xfs: avoid transaction reservation recursion Yafang Shao
2020-12-17  1:11 ` [PATCH v13 1/4] mm: Add become_kswapd and restore_kswapd Yafang Shao
2020-12-17  3:06   ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-17  4:00     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-12-17  4:46     ` Yafang Shao
2020-12-17  1:11 ` [PATCH v13 2/4] xfs: use memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} in xfs transaction Yafang Shao
2020-12-17  1:11 ` [PATCH v13 3/4] xfs: refactor the usage around xfs_trans_context_{set,clear} Yafang Shao
2020-12-17 22:15   ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-17 23:06     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-18  0:07       ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-19  0:31         ` Yafang Shao
2020-12-19  0:28     ` Yafang Shao
2020-12-17  1:11 ` Yafang Shao [this message]
2020-12-18  0:14   ` [PATCH v13 4/4] xfs: use current->journal_info to avoid transaction reservation recursion Dave Chinner
2020-12-19  0:16     ` Yafang Shao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201217011157.92549-5-laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).