linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fs: block_dev: compute nr_vecs hint for improving writeback bvecs allocation
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 16:45:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210106084548.GA3845805@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210105183938.GA3878@lst.de>

On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:39:38PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> At least for iomap I think this is the wrong approach.  Between the
> iomap and writeback_control we know the maximum size of the writeback
> request and can just use that.

I think writeback_control can tell us nothing about max pages in single
bio:

- wbc->nr_to_write controls how many pages to writeback, this pages
  usually don't belong to same bio. Also this number is often much
  bigger than BIO_MAX_PAGES.

- wbc->range_start/range_end is similar too, which is often much more
  bigger than BIO_MAX_PAGES.

Also page/blocks_in_page can be mapped to different extent too, which is
only available when wpc->ops->map_blocks() is returned, which looks not
different with mpage_writepages(), in which bio is allocated with
BIO_MAX_PAGES vecs too.

Or you mean we can use iomap->length for this purpose? But iomap->length
still is still too big in case of xfs.

-- 
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-06  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-05 13:26 [RFC PATCH] fs: block_dev: compute nr_vecs hint for improving writeback bvecs allocation Ming Lei
2021-01-05 18:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-06  8:45   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-01-06 22:21     ` Dave Chinner
2021-01-08  7:59       ` Ming Lei
2021-01-08 21:00         ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210106084548.GA3845805@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).