From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] char_dev: replace cdev_map with an xarray
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:20:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210111182029.GH35215@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <X/yUzVu04TyVuU/f@kroah.com>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 07:11:25PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 05:35:00PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 06:05:13PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > None of the complicated overlapping regions bits of the kobj_map are
> > > required for the character device lookup, so just a trivial xarray
> > > instead.
> >
> > Thanks for doing this. We could make it more efficient for chardevs
> > that occupy 64 or more consecutive/aligned devices -- is it worth doing?
>
> efficient in what way? Space or faster lookup?
Both, but primarily space.
The radix tree underlying the xarray allows N consecutive entries with
the same value to be represented as a single entry; if there are at
least 64 entries then we get to skip an entire level of the tree (saving
1/7 of a page). Of course, we'd need to go from the 'head' pointer to
the correct pointer, something like p += rdev - p->rdev.
> THis shouldn't be on a "fast" lookup path, so I doubt that's worth
> optimizing for. Space, maybe, for systems with thousands of scsi
> devices, but usually they just stick to the block device, not a char
> device from what I remember.
/dev/sgX is a chardev?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-11 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-11 17:05 [PATCH] char_dev: replace cdev_map with an xarray Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-11 17:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-01-11 18:11 ` Greg KH
2021-01-11 18:20 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2021-01-11 18:33 ` Greg KH
2021-01-11 18:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-01-11 18:10 ` Greg KH
2021-01-11 20:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-01-12 9:35 ` Greg KH
2021-01-12 10:00 ` David Laight
2021-01-12 10:25 ` 'Greg KH'
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210111182029.GH35215@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).