From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1BAC433E6 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 03:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F21E60C41 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 03:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229528AbhA1DXG (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:23:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41286 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229563AbhA1DXA (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:23:00 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11E7DC061573; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 19:22:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=yXwAf4SjrS2AfONW4GD6Gl+1dXhVs6G1QXceWMC0B3U=; b=BggS2jWk8dTVxp2paur15i7JfA R8lVnUKUj010vopE+hV2ucNtXxAI+OMXRBnTq+297HNfUfRtoIZs1WUnooeM4Niu0xVw4FgBX/aad /PKvbfZrNAq0MGuu59jF9/VhX7fEZpC4YCWxtSOSLFm6ytiRPRTY2jspVIsmAHJlxmwvjUC119p7D 4GZvRVuIzPqkyokEeAvRSdmjLsFviHUaAWAbpx9GHaHPb+fb0y8w5XEXU/nLSdw31w1IdWBiJ6+/B aFH7FGjI5ADyvhnh6J9/zHmY00jf5CGgZebLWlUjz9FimBBcju92re9dDL2zE/TwG4GWdRu/nf6AJ sxj/McKg==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l4xsj-007scR-5o; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 03:22:06 +0000 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 03:22:05 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: bingjingc Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.com, jack@suse.cz, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cccheng@synology.com, robbieko@synology.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] handle large user and group ID for isofs and udf Message-ID: <20210128032205.GV308988@casper.infradead.org> References: <1611800220-9481-1-git-send-email-bingjingc@synology.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1611800220-9481-1-git-send-email-bingjingc@synology.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:17:00AM +0800, bingjingc wrote: > From: BingJing Chang > > The uid/gid (unsigned int) of a domain user may be larger than INT_MAX. > The parse_options of isofs and udf will return 0, and mount will fail > with -EINVAL. These patches try to handle large user and group ID. > > BingJing Chang (3): > isofs: handle large user and group ID > udf: handle large user and group ID > parser: add unsigned int parser This is the wrong way to submit this patch series. Patch 1: add unsigned int parser Patch 2: Use it in isofs Patch 3: Use it in udf