* [PATCH v2] exfat: fix erroneous discard when clear cluster bit
@ 2021-03-02 5:20 ` Hyeongseok Kim
2021-03-04 3:42 ` Namjae Jeon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hyeongseok Kim @ 2021-03-02 5:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: namjae.jeon, sj1557.seo; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, Hyeongseok Kim
If mounted with discard option, exFAT issues discard command when clear
cluster bit to remove file. But the input parameter of cluster-to-sector
calculation is abnormally added by reserved cluster size which is 2,
leading to discard unrelated sectors included in target+2 cluster.
With fixing this, remove the wrong comments in set/clear/find bitmap
functions.
Fixes: 1e49a94cf707 ("exfat: add bitmap operations")
Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
---
fs/exfat/balloc.c | 15 +--------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exfat/balloc.c b/fs/exfat/balloc.c
index 761c79c3a4ba..54f1bcbddb26 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/balloc.c
@@ -141,10 +141,6 @@ void exfat_free_bitmap(struct exfat_sb_info *sbi)
kfree(sbi->vol_amap);
}
-/*
- * If the value of "clu" is 0, it means cluster 2 which is the first cluster of
- * the cluster heap.
- */
int exfat_set_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu)
{
int i, b;
@@ -162,10 +158,6 @@ int exfat_set_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu)
return 0;
}
-/*
- * If the value of "clu" is 0, it means cluster 2 which is the first cluster of
- * the cluster heap.
- */
void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu, bool sync)
{
int i, b;
@@ -186,8 +178,7 @@ void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu, bool sync)
int ret_discard;
ret_discard = sb_issue_discard(sb,
- exfat_cluster_to_sector(sbi, clu +
- EXFAT_RESERVED_CLUSTERS),
+ exfat_cluster_to_sector(sbi, clu),
(1 << sbi->sect_per_clus_bits), GFP_NOFS, 0);
if (ret_discard == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
@@ -197,10 +188,6 @@ void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu, bool sync)
}
}
-/*
- * If the value of "clu" is 0, it means cluster 2 which is the first cluster of
- * the cluster heap.
- */
unsigned int exfat_find_free_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int clu)
{
unsigned int i, map_i, map_b, ent_idx;
--
2.27.0.83.g0313f36
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v2] exfat: fix erroneous discard when clear cluster bit
2021-03-02 5:20 ` [PATCH v2] exfat: fix erroneous discard when clear cluster bit Hyeongseok Kim
@ 2021-03-04 3:42 ` Namjae Jeon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2021-03-04 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Hyeongseok Kim', sj1557.seo; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, stable
> If mounted with discard option, exFAT issues discard command when clear cluster bit to remove file.
> But the input parameter of cluster-to-sector calculation is abnormally added by reserved cluster size
> which is 2, leading to discard unrelated sectors included in target+2 cluster.
> With fixing this, remove the wrong comments in set/clear/find bitmap functions.
>
> Fixes: 1e49a94cf707 ("exfat: add bitmap operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
> Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Applied. Thanks for your patch!
> ---
> fs/exfat/balloc.c | 15 +--------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exfat/balloc.c b/fs/exfat/balloc.c index 761c79c3a4ba..54f1bcbddb26 100644
> --- a/fs/exfat/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/exfat/balloc.c
> @@ -141,10 +141,6 @@ void exfat_free_bitmap(struct exfat_sb_info *sbi)
> kfree(sbi->vol_amap);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * If the value of "clu" is 0, it means cluster 2 which is the first cluster of
> - * the cluster heap.
> - */
> int exfat_set_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu) {
> int i, b;
> @@ -162,10 +158,6 @@ int exfat_set_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * If the value of "clu" is 0, it means cluster 2 which is the first cluster of
> - * the cluster heap.
> - */
> void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu, bool sync) {
> int i, b;
> @@ -186,8 +178,7 @@ void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu, bool sync)
> int ret_discard;
>
> ret_discard = sb_issue_discard(sb,
> - exfat_cluster_to_sector(sbi, clu +
> - EXFAT_RESERVED_CLUSTERS),
> + exfat_cluster_to_sector(sbi, clu),
> (1 << sbi->sect_per_clus_bits), GFP_NOFS, 0);
>
> if (ret_discard == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
> @@ -197,10 +188,6 @@ void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu, bool sync)
> }
> }
>
> -/*
> - * If the value of "clu" is 0, it means cluster 2 which is the first cluster of
> - * the cluster heap.
> - */
> unsigned int exfat_find_free_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int clu) {
> unsigned int i, map_i, map_b, ent_idx;
> --
> 2.27.0.83.g0313f36
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-04 3:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CGME20210302052033epcas1p3c1bac591bdd1f94ffbef1272a3df137f@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
2021-03-02 5:20 ` [PATCH v2] exfat: fix erroneous discard when clear cluster bit Hyeongseok Kim
2021-03-04 3:42 ` Namjae Jeon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).