* [PATCH v2] exfat: fix erroneous discard when clear cluster bit @ 2021-03-02 5:20 ` Hyeongseok Kim 2021-03-04 3:42 ` Namjae Jeon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Hyeongseok Kim @ 2021-03-02 5:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: namjae.jeon, sj1557.seo; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, Hyeongseok Kim If mounted with discard option, exFAT issues discard command when clear cluster bit to remove file. But the input parameter of cluster-to-sector calculation is abnormally added by reserved cluster size which is 2, leading to discard unrelated sectors included in target+2 cluster. With fixing this, remove the wrong comments in set/clear/find bitmap functions. Fixes: 1e49a94cf707 ("exfat: add bitmap operations") Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com> --- fs/exfat/balloc.c | 15 +-------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/exfat/balloc.c b/fs/exfat/balloc.c index 761c79c3a4ba..54f1bcbddb26 100644 --- a/fs/exfat/balloc.c +++ b/fs/exfat/balloc.c @@ -141,10 +141,6 @@ void exfat_free_bitmap(struct exfat_sb_info *sbi) kfree(sbi->vol_amap); } -/* - * If the value of "clu" is 0, it means cluster 2 which is the first cluster of - * the cluster heap. - */ int exfat_set_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu) { int i, b; @@ -162,10 +158,6 @@ int exfat_set_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu) return 0; } -/* - * If the value of "clu" is 0, it means cluster 2 which is the first cluster of - * the cluster heap. - */ void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu, bool sync) { int i, b; @@ -186,8 +178,7 @@ void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu, bool sync) int ret_discard; ret_discard = sb_issue_discard(sb, - exfat_cluster_to_sector(sbi, clu + - EXFAT_RESERVED_CLUSTERS), + exfat_cluster_to_sector(sbi, clu), (1 << sbi->sect_per_clus_bits), GFP_NOFS, 0); if (ret_discard == -EOPNOTSUPP) { @@ -197,10 +188,6 @@ void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu, bool sync) } } -/* - * If the value of "clu" is 0, it means cluster 2 which is the first cluster of - * the cluster heap. - */ unsigned int exfat_find_free_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int clu) { unsigned int i, map_i, map_b, ent_idx; -- 2.27.0.83.g0313f36 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v2] exfat: fix erroneous discard when clear cluster bit 2021-03-02 5:20 ` [PATCH v2] exfat: fix erroneous discard when clear cluster bit Hyeongseok Kim @ 2021-03-04 3:42 ` Namjae Jeon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Namjae Jeon @ 2021-03-04 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Hyeongseok Kim', sj1557.seo; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, stable > If mounted with discard option, exFAT issues discard command when clear cluster bit to remove file. > But the input parameter of cluster-to-sector calculation is abnormally added by reserved cluster size > which is 2, leading to discard unrelated sectors included in target+2 cluster. > With fixing this, remove the wrong comments in set/clear/find bitmap functions. > > Fixes: 1e49a94cf707 ("exfat: add bitmap operations") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+ > Signed-off-by: Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com> > Acked-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com> Applied. Thanks for your patch! > --- > fs/exfat/balloc.c | 15 +-------------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/exfat/balloc.c b/fs/exfat/balloc.c index 761c79c3a4ba..54f1bcbddb26 100644 > --- a/fs/exfat/balloc.c > +++ b/fs/exfat/balloc.c > @@ -141,10 +141,6 @@ void exfat_free_bitmap(struct exfat_sb_info *sbi) > kfree(sbi->vol_amap); > } > > -/* > - * If the value of "clu" is 0, it means cluster 2 which is the first cluster of > - * the cluster heap. > - */ > int exfat_set_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu) { > int i, b; > @@ -162,10 +158,6 @@ int exfat_set_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu) > return 0; > } > > -/* > - * If the value of "clu" is 0, it means cluster 2 which is the first cluster of > - * the cluster heap. > - */ > void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu, bool sync) { > int i, b; > @@ -186,8 +178,7 @@ void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu, bool sync) > int ret_discard; > > ret_discard = sb_issue_discard(sb, > - exfat_cluster_to_sector(sbi, clu + > - EXFAT_RESERVED_CLUSTERS), > + exfat_cluster_to_sector(sbi, clu), > (1 << sbi->sect_per_clus_bits), GFP_NOFS, 0); > > if (ret_discard == -EOPNOTSUPP) { > @@ -197,10 +188,6 @@ void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu, bool sync) > } > } > > -/* > - * If the value of "clu" is 0, it means cluster 2 which is the first cluster of > - * the cluster heap. > - */ > unsigned int exfat_find_free_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int clu) { > unsigned int i, map_i, map_b, ent_idx; > -- > 2.27.0.83.g0313f36 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-04 3:44 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <CGME20210302052033epcas1p3c1bac591bdd1f94ffbef1272a3df137f@epcas1p3.samsung.com> 2021-03-02 5:20 ` [PATCH v2] exfat: fix erroneous discard when clear cluster bit Hyeongseok Kim 2021-03-04 3:42 ` Namjae Jeon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).