linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	tytso@mit.edu, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block_dump: don't put the last refcount when marking inode dirty
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 13:24:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210305132442.GA2801131@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210301112102.GD25026@quack2.suse.cz>

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 12:21:02PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hrm, ok. Honestly, I wanted to just delete that code for a long time. IMO
> tracepoints (and we have one in __mark_inode_dirty) are much more useful
> for tracing anyway. This code exists only because it was there much before
> tracepoints existed... Do you have a strong reason why are you using
> block_dump instead of tracepoint trace_writeback_mark_inode_dirty() for
> your monitoring?

Let me play devils advocate here, the downside of the writeback
tracepoints is that they only trace the inode number and not a file name
(component).  Which is also the reason they avoid this problem.

That being said block_dump is a horrible hack, and trace points are the
proper replacement.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-05 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-26 10:31 [PATCH] block_dump: don't put the last refcount when marking inode dirty zhangyi (F)
2021-03-01 11:21 ` Jan Kara
2021-03-04 13:37   ` zhangyi (F)
2021-03-05 10:10     ` Jan Kara
2021-03-05 12:01       ` zhangyi (F)
2021-03-05 13:24   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210305132442.GA2801131@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).