From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Performance improvement for fanotify merge
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 16:39:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210316153923.GC23532@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304104826.3993892-1-amir73il@gmail.com>
Hi Amir!
On Thu 04-03-21 12:48:21, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Jan,
>
> Following is v2 for the fanotify_merge() performance improvements.
>
> For more details on functional and performance tests please refer to
> v1 cover letter [1].
>
> This version is much simpler than v1 using standard hlist.
> It was rebased and tested against 5.12-rc1 using LTP tests [2].
Thanks for the patches. I've just changed that one small thing, otherwise
the patches look fine so I've merged them to my tree.
Honza
>
> Thanks,
> Amir.
>
> Chanes since v1:
> - Use hlist instead of multi notification lists
> - Handling all hashing within fanotify backend
> - Cram event key member together with event type
> - Remove ifdefs and use constant queue hash bits
> - Address other review comments on v1
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210202162010.305971-1-amir73il@gmail.com/
> [2] https://github.com/amir73il/ltp/commits/fanotify_merge
>
> Amir Goldstein (5):
> fsnotify: allow fsnotify_{peek,remove}_first_event with empty queue
> fanotify: reduce event objectid to 29-bit hash
> fanotify: mix event info and pid into merge key hash
> fsnotify: use hash table for faster events merge
> fanotify: limit number of event merge attempts
>
> fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 150 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.h | 46 +++++++-
> fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 65 ++++++++++--
> fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c | 9 +-
> fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c | 7 +-
> fs/notify/notification.c | 64 ++++++------
> include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h | 23 ++--
> 7 files changed, 263 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.30.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-16 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-04 10:48 [PATCH v2 0/5] Performance improvement for fanotify merge Amir Goldstein
2021-03-04 10:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] fsnotify: allow fsnotify_{peek,remove}_first_event with empty queue Amir Goldstein
2021-03-04 10:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] fanotify: reduce event objectid to 29-bit hash Amir Goldstein
2021-03-04 10:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] fanotify: mix event info and pid into merge key hash Amir Goldstein
2021-03-16 15:18 ` Jan Kara
2021-03-17 9:26 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-03-17 10:17 ` Jan Kara
2021-03-04 10:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] fsnotify: use hash table for faster events merge Amir Goldstein
2021-03-04 10:48 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] fanotify: limit number of event merge attempts Amir Goldstein
2021-03-16 15:39 ` Jan Kara [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210316153923.GC23532@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).