From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] hfsplus: Fix out-of-bounds warnings in __hfsplus_setxattr
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 05:53:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210331045357.GV351017@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210330214320.93600506530f1ab18338b467@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 09:43:20PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:52:26 -0500 "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Fix the following out-of-bounds warnings by enclosing
> > structure members file and finder into new struct info:
> >
> > fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:300:5: warning: 'memcpy' offset [65, 80] from the object at 'entry' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'user_info' with type 'struct DInfo' at offset 48 [-Warray-bounds]
> > fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:313:5: warning: 'memcpy' offset [65, 80] from the object at 'entry' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'user_info' with type 'struct FInfo' at offset 48 [-Warray-bounds]
> >
> > Refactor the code by making it more "structured."
> >
> > Also, this helps with the ongoing efforts to enable -Warray-bounds and
> > makes the code clearer and avoid confusing the compiler.
>
> Confused. What was wrong with the old code? Was this warning
> legitimate and if so, why? Or is this patch a workaround for a
> compiler shortcoming?
The offending line is this:
- memcpy(&entry.file.user_info, value,
+ memcpy(&entry.file.info, value,
file_finderinfo_len);
what it's trying to do is copy two structs which are adjacent to each
other in a single call to memcpy(). gcc legitimately complains that the
memcpy to this struct overruns the bounds of the struct. What Gustavo
has done here is introduce a new struct that contains the two structs,
and now gcc is happy that the memcpy doesn't overrun the length of this
containing struct.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-31 4:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-30 14:52 [PATCH][next] hfsplus: Fix out-of-bounds warnings in __hfsplus_setxattr Gustavo A. R. Silva
2021-03-31 4:43 ` Andrew Morton
2021-03-31 4:53 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2021-03-31 21:21 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210331045357.GV351017@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).