From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3DCC433ED for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 19:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01526105A for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 19:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349078AbhDGT64 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:58:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35910 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231335AbhDGT64 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:58:56 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E156C06175F; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:58:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=JjXV4iIMrHWU9i+xZKHGpsUVd6AqcmhooDRZ//lUvEg=; b=XeAVDBiyS7Tj0prG+DOS4Zb3Jy sq87OZpN37+BzWHpapHrEajb5sSM4kcRn8q91boCj6INEfRKlCfjDhYe4ulmdWCmyorAXu+/c6iOF rShOkIbOeB2zkY+mdgU7VbKrHFdjcobj0wfMDD1MGhMQ/mvioh5ah0XjFvDKoMGicpZkbqyCKO5og 3OtXef4gzxTEA+TsjLd3qtbMQcfAEON/u32ykfF3d71/v4CxHpUD8VF62UoZ/7xj8+LSQzPsVi+No qoQsqSE8ANU1tW4RSqzO/9nW0OpXtfOCS4mF5GrZFjzutBEupjyA0SlRpXV/Npeb55RAS3DqwZ1V9 s5OLKejQ==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lUEJV-00F0ZE-Jp; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 19:58:17 +0000 Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 20:58:09 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: smoke test lseek() Message-ID: <20210407195809.GG2531743@casper.infradead.org> References: <20210328221524.ukfuztGsl%akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 10:55:14PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > Now that ->proc_lseek has been made mandatory it would be nice to test > that nothing has been forgotten. > @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ static void f_reg(DIR *d, const char *filename) > fd = openat(dirfd(d), filename, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK); > if (fd == -1) > return; > + /* struct proc_ops::proc_lseek is mandatory if file is seekable. */ > + (void)lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET); > rv = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf)); > assert((0 <= rv && rv <= sizeof(buf)) || rv == -1); > close(fd); why throw away the return value? if it returns an error seeking to offset 0, something is terribly wrong.