linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
	Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] open: don't silently ignore unknown O-flags in openat2()
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:10:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210423111037.3590242-2-brauner@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210423111037.3590242-1-brauner@kernel.org>

From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>

The new openat2() syscall verifies that no unknown O-flag values are
set and returns an error to userspace if they are while the older open
syscalls like open() and openat2() simply ignore unknown flag values:

  #define O_FLAG_CURRENTLY_INVALID (1 << 31)
  struct open_how how = {
          .flags = O_RDONLY | O_FLAG_CURRENTLY_INVALID,
          .resolve = 0,
  };

  /* fails */
  fd = openat2(-EBADF, "/dev/null", &how, sizeof(how));

  /* succeeds */
  fd = openat(-EBADF, "/dev/null", O_RDONLY | O_FLAG_CURRENTLY_INVALID);

However, openat2() silently truncates the upper 32 bits meaning:

  #define O_FLAG_CURRENTLY_INVALID_LOWER32 (1 << 31)
  #define O_FLAG_CURRENTLY_INVALID_UPPER32 (1 << 40)

  struct open_how how_lowe32 = {
          .flags = O_RDONLY | O_FLAG_CURRENTLY_INVALID_LOWE32,
          .resolve = 0,
  };

  struct open_how how_upper32 = {
          .flags = O_RDONLY | O_FLAG_CURRENTLY_INVALID_LOWE32,
          .resolve = 0,
  };

  /* fails */
  fd = openat2(-EBADF, "/dev/null", &how_lower32, sizeof(how_lower32));

  /* succeeds */
  fd = openat2(-EBADF, "/dev/null", &how_upper32, sizeof(how_upper32));

That seems like a bug. Fix it by preventing the truncation in
build_open_flags().

There's a snafu here though stripping FMODE_* directly from flags would
cause the upper 32 bits to be truncated as well due to integer promotion
rules since FMODE_* is unsigned int, O_* are signed ints (yuck).

This change shouldn't regress old open syscalls since they silently
truncate any unknown values.

Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
---
 fs/open.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c
index e53af13b5835..96644aa325eb 100644
--- a/fs/open.c
+++ b/fs/open.c
@@ -1002,12 +1002,17 @@ inline struct open_how build_open_how(int flags, umode_t mode)
 
 inline int build_open_flags(const struct open_how *how, struct open_flags *op)
 {
-	int flags = how->flags;
+	u64 flags = how->flags;
+	u64 strip = FMODE_NONOTIFY | O_CLOEXEC;
 	int lookup_flags = 0;
 	int acc_mode = ACC_MODE(flags);
 
-	/* Must never be set by userspace */
-	flags &= ~(FMODE_NONOTIFY | O_CLOEXEC);
+	/*
+	 * Strip flags that either shouldn't be set by userspace like
+	 * FMODE_NONOTIFY or that aren't relevant in determining struct
+	 * open_flags like O_CLOEXEC.
+	 */
+	flags &= ~strip;
 
 	/*
 	 * Older syscalls implicitly clear all of the invalid flags or argument
-- 
2.27.0


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-23 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-23 11:10 [PATCH 1/3] fcntl: remove unused VALID_UPGRADE_FLAGS Christian Brauner
2021-04-23 11:10 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2021-04-23 13:50   ` [PATCH 2/3] open: don't silently ignore unknown O-flags in openat2() Richard Guy Briggs
2021-04-26 13:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-01  0:53   ` Aleksa Sarai
2021-04-23 11:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] test: add openat2() test for invalid upper 32 bit flag value Christian Brauner
2021-04-30 15:24   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2021-04-30 16:09     ` Christian Brauner
2021-04-30 16:46       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2021-04-30 17:08         ` Christian Brauner
2021-04-30 17:22           ` Richard Guy Briggs
2021-04-23 12:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] fcntl: remove unused VALID_UPGRADE_FLAGS Richard Guy Briggs
2021-04-26 13:33 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210423111037.3590242-2-brauner@kernel.org \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).