From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
shakeelb@google.com, guro@fb.com, shy828301@gmail.com,
alexs@kernel.org, alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com,
richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] mm: list_lru: rename memcg_drain_all_list_lrus to memcg_reparent_list_lrus
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:49:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210428094949.43579-4-songmuchun@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210428094949.43579-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Since we do not change memcg->kmemcg_id before calling
memcg_drain_all_list_lrus(), so we do not need to take kmemcg_id as
parameter. The two parameters of memcg_drain_all_list_lrus() seems
odd, one is kmemcg_id, another is memcg. Now we can change the
kmemcg_id to the memcg. It is more consistent. Since the purpose of
the memcg_drain_all_list_lrus() is list_lru reparenting. So also
rename it to memcg_reparent_list_lrus(). The name is also consistent
with memcg_reparent_objcgs().
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
include/linux/list_lru.h | 2 +-
mm/list_lru.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/list_lru.h b/include/linux/list_lru.h
index 9dcaa3e582c9..e8a5e3a2c0dd 100644
--- a/include/linux/list_lru.h
+++ b/include/linux/list_lru.h
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ int __list_lru_init(struct list_lru *lru, bool memcg_aware,
__list_lru_init((lru), true, NULL, shrinker)
int memcg_update_all_list_lrus(int num_memcgs);
-void memcg_drain_all_list_lrus(int src_idx, struct mem_cgroup *dst_memcg);
+void memcg_reparent_list_lrus(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgroup *parent);
/**
* list_lru_add: add an element to the lru list's tail
diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c
index 4962d48d4410..d78dba5a6dab 100644
--- a/mm/list_lru.c
+++ b/mm/list_lru.c
@@ -523,11 +523,11 @@ int memcg_update_all_list_lrus(int new_size)
goto out;
}
-static void memcg_drain_list_lru_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
- int src_idx, struct mem_cgroup *dst_memcg)
+static void memcg_reparent_list_lru_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ struct mem_cgroup *parent)
{
struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
- int dst_idx = dst_memcg->kmemcg_id;
struct list_lru_one *src, *dst;
/*
@@ -536,22 +536,23 @@ static void memcg_drain_list_lru_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
*/
spin_lock_irq(&nlru->lock);
- src = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(nlru, src_idx);
- dst = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(nlru, dst_idx);
+ src = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(nlru, memcg->kmemcg_id);
+ dst = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(nlru, parent->kmemcg_id);
list_splice_init(&src->list, &dst->list);
if (src->nr_items) {
dst->nr_items += src->nr_items;
- set_shrinker_bit(dst_memcg, nid, lru_shrinker_id(lru));
+ set_shrinker_bit(parent, nid, lru_shrinker_id(lru));
src->nr_items = 0;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&nlru->lock);
}
-static void memcg_drain_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru,
- int src_idx, struct mem_cgroup *dst_memcg)
+static void memcg_reparent_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru,
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ struct mem_cgroup *parent)
{
int i;
@@ -559,16 +560,16 @@ static void memcg_drain_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru,
return;
for_each_node(i)
- memcg_drain_list_lru_node(lru, i, src_idx, dst_memcg);
+ memcg_reparent_list_lru_node(lru, i, memcg, parent);
}
-void memcg_drain_all_list_lrus(int src_idx, struct mem_cgroup *dst_memcg)
+void memcg_reparent_list_lrus(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgroup *parent)
{
struct list_lru *lru;
mutex_lock(&list_lrus_mutex);
list_for_each_entry(lru, &list_lrus, list)
- memcg_drain_list_lru(lru, src_idx, dst_memcg);
+ memcg_reparent_list_lru(lru, memcg, parent);
mutex_unlock(&list_lrus_mutex);
}
#else
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 21e12312509c..c1ce4fdba028 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3503,7 +3503,7 @@ static void memcg_offline_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
BUG_ON(kmemcg_id < 0);
/* memcg_reparent_objcgs() must be called before this. */
- memcg_drain_all_list_lrus(kmemcg_id, parent);
+ memcg_reparent_list_lrus(memcg, parent);
memcg_free_cache_id(kmemcg_id);
}
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-28 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-28 9:49 [PATCH 0/9] Shrink the list lru size on memory cgroup removal Muchun Song
2021-04-28 9:49 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm: list_lru: fix list_lru_count_one() return value Muchun Song
2021-04-28 9:49 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm: memcontrol: remove kmemcg_id reparenting Muchun Song
2021-04-28 9:49 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2021-04-28 9:49 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm: memcontrol: remove the kmem states Muchun Song
2021-04-28 9:49 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm: memcontrol: move memcg_online_kmem() to mem_cgroup_css_online() Muchun Song
2021-04-28 9:49 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm: list_lru: support for shrinking list lru Muchun Song
2021-04-28 9:49 ` [PATCH 7/9] ida: introduce ida_max() to return the maximum allocated ID Muchun Song
2021-04-29 6:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-29 7:36 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-04-28 9:49 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm: memcontrol: shrink the list lru size Muchun Song
2021-04-28 9:49 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm: memcontrol: rename memcg_{get,put}_cache_ids to memcg_list_lru_resize_{lock,unlock} Muchun Song
2021-04-28 23:32 ` [PATCH 0/9] Shrink the list lru size on memory cgroup removal Shakeel Butt
2021-04-29 3:05 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-04-30 0:49 ` Dave Chinner
2021-04-30 1:39 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-04-30 3:27 ` Dave Chinner
2021-04-30 8:32 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-05-01 3:10 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-05-01 3:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-05-02 23:58 ` Dave Chinner
2021-05-03 6:33 ` Muchun Song
2021-05-05 1:13 ` Dave Chinner
2021-05-07 5:45 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210428094949.43579-4-songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--to=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexs@kernel.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).