From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Gulam Mohamed <gulam.mohamed@oracle.com>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, axboe@kernel.dk,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, junxiao.bi@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/1] Fix race between iscsi logout and systemd-udevd
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 08:35:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210512063505.GA18367@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YJtKT7rLi2CFqDsV@T590>
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:23:59AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>
> 1) code path BLKRRPART:
> mutex_lock(bdev->bd_mutex)
> down_read(&bdev_lookup_sem);
>
> 2) del_gendisk():
> down_write(&bdev_lookup_sem);
> mutex_lock(&disk->part0->bd_mutex);
>
> Given GENHD_FL_UP is only checked when opening one bdev, and
> fsync_bdev() and __invalidate_device() needn't to open bdev, so
> the following way may work for your issue:
If we move the clearing of GENHD_FL_UP earlier we can do away with
bdev_lookup_sem entirely I think. Something like this untested patch:
diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index a5847560719c..ef717084b343 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -29,8 +29,6 @@
static struct kobject *block_depr;
-DECLARE_RWSEM(bdev_lookup_sem);
-
/* for extended dynamic devt allocation, currently only one major is used */
#define NR_EXT_DEVT (1 << MINORBITS)
static DEFINE_IDA(ext_devt_ida);
@@ -609,13 +607,8 @@ void del_gendisk(struct gendisk *disk)
blk_integrity_del(disk);
disk_del_events(disk);
- /*
- * Block lookups of the disk until all bdevs are unhashed and the
- * disk is marked as dead (GENHD_FL_UP cleared).
- */
- down_write(&bdev_lookup_sem);
-
mutex_lock(&disk->open_mutex);
+ disk->flags &= ~GENHD_FL_UP;
blk_drop_partitions(disk);
mutex_unlock(&disk->open_mutex);
@@ -627,10 +620,7 @@ void del_gendisk(struct gendisk *disk)
* up any more even if openers still hold references to it.
*/
remove_inode_hash(disk->part0->bd_inode);
-
set_capacity(disk, 0);
- disk->flags &= ~GENHD_FL_UP;
- up_write(&bdev_lookup_sem);
if (!(disk->flags & GENHD_FL_HIDDEN)) {
sysfs_remove_link(&disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj, "bdi");
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 8dd8e2fd1401..bde23940190f 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1377,33 +1377,24 @@ struct block_device *blkdev_get_no_open(dev_t dev)
struct block_device *bdev;
struct gendisk *disk;
- down_read(&bdev_lookup_sem);
bdev = bdget(dev);
if (!bdev) {
- up_read(&bdev_lookup_sem);
blk_request_module(dev);
- down_read(&bdev_lookup_sem);
-
bdev = bdget(dev);
if (!bdev)
- goto unlock;
+ return NULL;
}
disk = bdev->bd_disk;
if (!kobject_get_unless_zero(&disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj))
goto bdput;
- if ((disk->flags & (GENHD_FL_UP | GENHD_FL_HIDDEN)) != GENHD_FL_UP)
- goto put_disk;
if (!try_module_get(bdev->bd_disk->fops->owner))
goto put_disk;
- up_read(&bdev_lookup_sem);
return bdev;
put_disk:
put_disk(disk);
bdput:
bdput(bdev);
-unlock:
- up_read(&bdev_lookup_sem);
return NULL;
}
@@ -1462,7 +1453,10 @@ struct block_device *blkdev_get_by_dev(dev_t dev, fmode_t mode, void *holder)
disk_block_events(disk);
+ ret = -ENXIO;
mutex_lock(&disk->open_mutex);
+ if ((disk->flags & (GENHD_FL_UP | GENHD_FL_HIDDEN)) != GENHD_FL_UP)
+ goto abort_claiming;
if (bdev_is_partition(bdev))
ret = blkdev_get_part(bdev, mode);
else
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-12 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-11 18:15 [PATCH V1 1/1] Fix race between iscsi logout and systemd-udevd Gulam Mohamed
2021-05-12 3:23 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-12 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-05-12 7:23 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-12 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-04-27 10:13 Gulam Mohamed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210512063505.GA18367@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gulam.mohamed@oracle.com \
--cc=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).