From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1553C48BE6 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 03:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B8861075 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 03:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230188AbhFPDxT (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:53:19 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:52219 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229992AbhFPDxS (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:53:18 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 2CDD268AFE; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 05:51:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 05:51:10 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Kees Cook Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , gmpy.liaowx@gmail.com, Anton Vorontsov , Colin Cross , Tony Luck , Jonathan Corbet , Miquel Raynal , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] pstore/blk: Improve failure reporting Message-ID: <20210616035109.GA25873@lst.de> References: <20210615212121.1200820-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20210615212121.1200820-2-keescook@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210615212121.1200820-2-keescook@chromium.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 02:21:18PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > - if (!dev || !dev->total_size || !dev->read || !dev->write) > + if (!dev || !dev->total_size || !dev->read || !dev->write) { > + if (!dev) > + pr_err("NULL device info\n"); > + else { > + if (!dev->total_size) > + pr_err("zero sized device\n"); > + if (!dev->read) > + pr_err("no read handler for device\n"); > + if (!dev->write) > + pr_err("no write handler for device\n"); > + } > return -EINVAL; > + } I still find this style of checks pretty strange..