From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765ACC48BE6 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 04:02:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9B0613C2 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 04:02:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229673AbhFPEE4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:04:56 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:52296 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229476AbhFPEE4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:04:56 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id A23E468AFE; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 06:02:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 06:02:47 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Kees Cook Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , gmpy.liaowx@gmail.com, Anton Vorontsov , Colin Cross , Tony Luck , Jonathan Corbet , Miquel Raynal , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] pstore/blk: Include zone in pstore_device_info Message-ID: <20210616040247.GD25873@lst.de> References: <20210615212121.1200820-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20210615212121.1200820-4-keescook@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210615212121.1200820-4-keescook@chromium.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org > +#define verify_size(name, alignsize, enabled) { \ > + long _##name_; \ > + if (enabled) \ > + _##name_ = check_size(name, alignsize); \ > + else \ > + _##name_ = 0; \ > + /* synchronize visible module parameters to result. */ \ > + name = _##name_ / 1024; \ > + dev->zone.name = _##name_; \ > + } The formatting here looks weird between the two-tab indent and the opening brace on the macro definition line. > - if (!dev || !dev->total_size || !dev->read || !dev->write) { > + if (!dev || !dev->zone.total_size || !dev->zone.read || !dev->zone.write) { > if (!dev) > - pr_err("NULL device info\n"); > + pr_err("NULL pstore_device_info\n"); > else { > - if (!dev->total_size) > + if (!dev->zone.total_size) > pr_err("zero sized device\n"); > - if (!dev->read) > + if (!dev->zone.read) > pr_err("no read handler for device\n"); > - if (!dev->write) > + if (!dev->zone.write) > pr_err("no write handler for device\n"); > } This still looks odd to me. Why not the somewhat more verbose but much more obvious: if (!dev) { pr_err("NULL pstore_device_info\n"); return -EINVAL; } if (!dev->zone.total_size) { pr_err("zero sized device\n"); return -EINVAL; } ... > - dev.total_size = i_size_read(I_BDEV(psblk_file->f_mapping->host)->bd_inode); > + dev->zone.total_size = i_size_read(I_BDEV(psblk_file->f_mapping->host)->bd_inode); This is starting to be unreadable long. A local variable for the inode might be nice, as that can also be used in the ISBLK check above. > + if (!pstore_device_info && best_effort && blkdev[0]) { > + struct pstore_device_info *best_effort_dev; > + > + best_effort_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*best_effort_dev), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!best_effort) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto unlock; > + } > + best_effort_dev->zone.read = psblk_generic_blk_read; > + best_effort_dev->zone.write = psblk_generic_blk_write; > + > + ret = __register_pstore_blk(best_effort_dev, > + early_boot_devpath(blkdev)); > + if (ret) > + kfree(best_effort_dev); > + else > + pr_info("attached %s (%zu) (no dedicated panic_write!)\n", > + blkdev, best_effort_dev->zone.total_size); Maybe split this into a little helper? > + /* Unregister and free the best_effort device. */ > + if (psblk_file) { > + struct pstore_device_info *dev = pstore_device_info; > + > + __unregister_pstore_device(dev); > + kfree(dev); > + fput(psblk_file); > + psblk_file = NULL; > } Same. > + /* If we've been asked to unload, unregister any registered device. */ > + if (pstore_device_info) > + __unregister_pstore_device(pstore_device_info); Won't this double unregister pstore_device_info? > struct pstore_device_info { > - unsigned long total_size; > unsigned int flags; > - pstore_zone_read_op read; > - pstore_zone_write_op write; > - pstore_zone_erase_op erase; > - pstore_zone_write_op panic_write; > + struct pstore_zone_info zone; > }; Given that flags is only used inside of __register_pstore_device why not kill this struct and just pass it explicitly?