From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: virtio-fs@redhat.com, dwalsh@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com,
berrange@redhat.com, oliver.sang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] xattr: Allow user.* xattr on symlink/special files with CAP_SYS_RESOURCE
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:00:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210628150020.GD1803896@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210625191229.1752531-2-vgoyal@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 03:12:29PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> As of now user.* xattrs are allowed only on regular files and directories.
> And in case of directories if sticky bit is set, then it is allowed
> only if caller is owner or has CAP_FOWNER.
>
> "man xattr" suggests that primary reason behind this restrcition is that
> users can set unlimited amount of "user.*" xattrs on symlinks and special
> files and bypass quota checks. Following is from man page.
>
> "These differences would allow users to consume filesystem resources in
> a way not controllable by disk quotas for group or world writable spe‐
> cial files and directories"
>
> Capability CAP_SYS_RESOURCE allows for overriding disk quota limits. If
> being able to bypass quota is primary reason behind these restrictions,
> can we relax these restrictions if caller has CAP_SYS_RESOURCE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Got an email from intel kernel test robot that xfstest generic/062 breaks
due to this change.
I think I will have to fix the test case because test is working with
previous behvior where "user.*" xattr will not be permitted on
non-regular/non-dir file.
Thanks
Vivek
> ---
> fs/xattr.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xattr.c b/fs/xattr.c
> index 5c8c5175b385..10bb918029dd 100644
> --- a/fs/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/xattr.c
> @@ -124,7 +124,8 @@ xattr_permission(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode,
> * extended attributes. For sticky directories, only the owner and
> * privileged users can write attributes.
> */
> - if (!strncmp(name, XATTR_USER_PREFIX, XATTR_USER_PREFIX_LEN)) {
> + if (!strncmp(name, XATTR_USER_PREFIX, XATTR_USER_PREFIX_LEN) &&
> + !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) {
> if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && !S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
> return (mask & MAY_WRITE) ? -EPERM : -ENODATA;
> if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) && (inode->i_mode & S_ISVTX) &&
> --
> 2.25.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-28 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-25 19:12 [RFC PATCH 0/1] xattr: Allow user.* xattr on symlink/special files if caller has CAP_SYS_RESOURCE Vivek Goyal
2021-06-25 19:12 ` [PATCH 1/1] xattr: Allow user.* xattr on symlink/special files with CAP_SYS_RESOURCE Vivek Goyal
2021-06-28 12:33 ` Christian Brauner
2021-06-28 15:00 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2021-06-29 3:13 ` [xattr] 8d8cd767b6: ltp.setxattr02.fail kernel test robot
2021-06-29 12:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-06-25 21:49 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] xattr: Allow user.* xattr on symlink/special files if caller has CAP_SYS_RESOURCE Schaufler, Casey
2021-06-28 11:58 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-06-28 13:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-06-28 13:36 ` Daniel Walsh
2021-06-28 16:04 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-06-28 16:28 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-06-28 17:41 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-06-29 9:00 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-06-29 14:38 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-06-29 15:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-06-29 16:13 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-06-29 16:35 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-06-29 16:51 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-06-29 17:35 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-06-29 20:28 ` Daniel Walsh
2021-06-30 4:12 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-06-30 8:07 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-06-30 14:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-06-30 15:01 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-06-30 19:59 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-06-30 20:32 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-07-01 8:48 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-07-01 12:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-07-01 13:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-07-01 16:58 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-06-30 16:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-06-30 14:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-06-29 16:25 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-06-28 17:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-06-28 18:55 ` Daniel Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210628150020.GD1803896@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=dwalsh@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).