From: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/1] proc: Allow pid_revalidate() during LOOKUP_RCU
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:56:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211004175629.292270-2-stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211004175629.292270-1-stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>
The pid_revalidate() function drops from RCU into REF lookup mode. When
many threads are resolving paths within /proc in parallel, this can
result in heavy spinlock contention on d_lockref as each thread tries to
grab a reference to the /proc dentry (and drop it shortly thereafter).
Investigation indicates that it is not necessary to drop RCU in
pid_revalidate(), as no RCU data is modified and the function never
sleeps. So, remove the LOOKUP_RCU check.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 533d5836eb9a..3042ab418c31 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -1979,19 +1979,21 @@ static int pid_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
{
struct inode *inode;
struct task_struct *task;
+ int ret = 0;
- if (flags & LOOKUP_RCU)
- return -ECHILD;
-
- inode = d_inode(dentry);
- task = get_proc_task(inode);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ inode = d_inode_rcu(dentry);
+ if (!inode)
+ goto out;
+ task = pid_task(proc_pid(inode), PIDTYPE_PID);
if (task) {
pid_update_inode(task, inode);
- put_task_struct(task);
- return 1;
+ ret = 1;
}
- return 0;
+out:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return ret;
}
static inline bool proc_inode_is_dead(struct inode *inode)
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-04 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-04 17:56 [PATCH v6 0/1] proc: Allow pid_revalidate() during LOOKUP_RCU Stephen Brennan
2021-10-04 17:56 ` Stephen Brennan [this message]
2021-10-04 18:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-10-04 18:41 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211004175629.292270-2-stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com \
--to=stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).