From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Zhengyuan Liu <liuzhengyuang521@gmail.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
mysql@lists.mysql.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
刘云 <liuyun01@kylinos.cn>,
"Zhengyuan Liu" <liuzhengyuan@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: Problem with direct IO
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:43:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211018114349.b80a27af9bfa7f16162b0ec4@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOOPZo4ZycbV8W2w48oD+bM8a1+WqejSjjYuheZPyxm2uE-=rA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:09:06 +0800 Zhengyuan Liu <liuzhengyuang521@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ping.
>
> I think this problem is serious and someone may also encounter it in
> the future.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 9:46 AM Zhengyuan Liu
> <liuzhengyuang521@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, all
> >
> > we are encounting following Mysql crash problem while importing tables :
> >
> > 2021-09-26T11:22:17.825250Z 0 [ERROR] [MY-013622] [InnoDB] [FATAL]
> > fsync() returned EIO, aborting.
> > 2021-09-26T11:22:17.825315Z 0 [ERROR] [MY-013183] [InnoDB]
> > Assertion failure: ut0ut.cc:555 thread 281472996733168
> >
> > At the same time , we found dmesg had following message:
> >
> > [ 4328.838972] Page cache invalidation failure on direct I/O.
> > Possible data corruption due to collision with buffered I/O!
> > [ 4328.850234] File: /data/mysql/data/sysbench/sbtest53.ibd PID:
> > 625 Comm: kworker/42:1
> >
> > Firstly, we doubled Mysql has operating the file with direct IO and
> > buffered IO interlaced, but after some checking we found it did only
> > do direct IO using aio. The problem is exactly from direct-io
> > interface (__generic_file_write_iter) itself.
> >
> > ssize_t __generic_file_write_iter()
> > {
> > ...
> > if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) {
> > loff_t pos, endbyte;
> >
> > written = generic_file_direct_write(iocb, from);
> > /*
> > * If the write stopped short of completing, fall back to
> > * buffered writes. Some filesystems do this for writes to
> > * holes, for example. For DAX files, a buffered write will
> > * not succeed (even if it did, DAX does not handle dirty
> > * page-cache pages correctly).
> > */
> > if (written < 0 || !iov_iter_count(from) || IS_DAX(inode))
> > goto out;
> >
> > status = generic_perform_write(file, from, pos = iocb->ki_pos);
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > From above code snippet we can see that direct io could fall back to
> > buffered IO under certain conditions, so even Mysql only did direct IO
> > it could interleave with buffered IO when fall back occurred. I have
> > no idea why FS(ext3) failed the direct IO currently, but it is strange
> > __generic_file_write_iter make direct IO fall back to buffered IO, it
> > seems breaking the semantics of direct IO.
That makes sense.
> > The reproduced environment is:
> > Platform: Kunpeng 920 (arm64)
> > Kernel: V5.15-rc
> > PAGESIZE: 64K
> > Mysql: V8.0
> > Innodb_page_size: default(16K)
This is all fairly mature code, I think. Do you know if earlier
kernels were OK, and if so which versions?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-18 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-13 1:46 Problem with direct IO Zhengyuan Liu
2021-10-18 1:09 ` Zhengyuan Liu
2021-10-18 18:43 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2021-10-19 3:39 ` Zhengyuan Liu
2021-10-20 17:37 ` Jan Kara
2021-10-21 2:21 ` Zhengyuan Liu
2021-10-21 8:03 ` Jan Kara
2021-10-21 12:11 ` Zhengyuan Liu
2021-10-22 9:31 ` Jan Kara
2021-10-23 2:06 ` Zhengyuan Liu
2021-10-25 15:57 ` Jan Kara
2021-10-28 15:02 ` Zhengyuan Liu
[not found] ` <61712B10.2060408@huawei.com>
2021-10-21 12:20 ` Zhengyuan Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211018114349.b80a27af9bfa7f16162b0ec4@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuyun01@kylinos.cn \
--cc=liuzhengyuan@kylinos.cn \
--cc=liuzhengyuang521@gmail.com \
--cc=mysql@lists.mysql.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).