From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locks: remove changelog comments
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 06:50:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211020065033.032c86f9@sal.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f4a14d0a455c5a93eccfdf2dc8555b82b79694b.camel@kernel.org>
Em Tue, 19 Oct 2021 14:14:08 -0400
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> escreveu:
> On Tue, 2021-10-19 at 13:38 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
> >
> > This is only of historical interest, and anyone interested in the
> > history can dig out an old version of locks.c from from git.
> >
> > Triggered by the observation that it references the now-removed
> > Documentation/filesystems/mandatory-locking.rst.
> >
> > Reported-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > fs/locks.c | 114 ++---------------------------------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:27:55PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > Yeah, I think that looks great. Send it with a changelog and I'll pull
> > > it into the branch I have feeding into -next.
> >
> > OK!--b.
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> > index 3d6fb4ae847b..b54813eae44f 100644
> > --- a/fs/locks.c
> > +++ b/fs/locks.c
> > @@ -2,117 +2,11 @@
> > /*
> > * linux/fs/locks.c
> > *
> > - * Provide support for fcntl()'s F_GETLK, F_SETLK, and F_SETLKW calls.
> > - * Doug Evans (dje@spiff.uucp), August 07, 1992
> > + * We implement four types of file locks: BSD locks, posix locks, open
> > + * file description locks, and leases. For details about BSD locks,
> > + * see the flock(2) man page; for details about the other three, see
> > + * fcntl(2).
> > *
> > - * Deadlock detection added.
> > - * FIXME: one thing isn't handled yet:
> > - * - mandatory locks (requires lots of changes elsewhere)
> > - * Kelly Carmichael (kelly@[142.24.8.65]), September 17, 1994.
> > - *
> > - * Miscellaneous edits, and a total rewrite of posix_lock_file() code.
> > - * Kai Petzke (wpp@marie.physik.tu-berlin.de), 1994
> > - *
> > - * Converted file_lock_table to a linked list from an array, which eliminates
> > - * the limits on how many active file locks are open.
> > - * Chad Page (pageone@netcom.com), November 27, 1994
> > - *
> > - * Removed dependency on file descriptors. dup()'ed file descriptors now
> > - * get the same locks as the original file descriptors, and a close() on
> > - * any file descriptor removes ALL the locks on the file for the current
> > - * process. Since locks still depend on the process id, locks are inherited
> > - * after an exec() but not after a fork(). This agrees with POSIX, and both
> > - * BSD and SVR4 practice.
> > - * Andy Walker (andy@lysaker.kvaerner.no), February 14, 1995
> > - *
> > - * Scrapped free list which is redundant now that we allocate locks
> > - * dynamically with kmalloc()/kfree().
> > - * Andy Walker (andy@lysaker.kvaerner.no), February 21, 1995
> > - *
> > - * Implemented two lock personalities - FL_FLOCK and FL_POSIX.
> > - *
> > - * FL_POSIX locks are created with calls to fcntl() and lockf() through the
> > - * fcntl() system call. They have the semantics described above.
> > - *
> > - * FL_FLOCK locks are created with calls to flock(), through the flock()
> > - * system call, which is new. Old C libraries implement flock() via fcntl()
> > - * and will continue to use the old, broken implementation.
> > - *
> > - * FL_FLOCK locks follow the 4.4 BSD flock() semantics. They are associated
> > - * with a file pointer (filp). As a result they can be shared by a parent
> > - * process and its children after a fork(). They are removed when the last
> > - * file descriptor referring to the file pointer is closed (unless explicitly
> > - * unlocked).
> > - *
> > - * FL_FLOCK locks never deadlock, an existing lock is always removed before
> > - * upgrading from shared to exclusive (or vice versa). When this happens
> > - * any processes blocked by the current lock are woken up and allowed to
> > - * run before the new lock is applied.
> > - * Andy Walker (andy@lysaker.kvaerner.no), June 09, 1995
> > - *
> > - * Removed some race conditions in flock_lock_file(), marked other possible
> > - * races. Just grep for FIXME to see them.
> > - * Dmitry Gorodchanin (pgmdsg@ibi.com), February 09, 1996.
> > - *
> > - * Addressed Dmitry's concerns. Deadlock checking no longer recursive.
> > - * Lock allocation changed to GFP_ATOMIC as we can't afford to sleep
> > - * once we've checked for blocking and deadlocking.
> > - * Andy Walker (andy@lysaker.kvaerner.no), April 03, 1996.
> > - *
> > - * Initial implementation of mandatory locks. SunOS turned out to be
> > - * a rotten model, so I implemented the "obvious" semantics.
> > - * See 'Documentation/filesystems/mandatory-locking.rst' for details.
> > - * Andy Walker (andy@lysaker.kvaerner.no), April 06, 1996.
> > - *
> > - * Don't allow mandatory locks on mmap()'ed files. Added simple functions to
> > - * check if a file has mandatory locks, used by mmap(), open() and creat() to
> > - * see if system call should be rejected. Ref. HP-UX/SunOS/Solaris Reference
> > - * Manual, Section 2.
> > - * Andy Walker (andy@lysaker.kvaerner.no), April 09, 1996.
> > - *
> > - * Tidied up block list handling. Added '/proc/locks' interface.
> > - * Andy Walker (andy@lysaker.kvaerner.no), April 24, 1996.
> > - *
> > - * Fixed deadlock condition for pathological code that mixes calls to
> > - * flock() and fcntl().
> > - * Andy Walker (andy@lysaker.kvaerner.no), April 29, 1996.
> > - *
> > - * Allow only one type of locking scheme (FL_POSIX or FL_FLOCK) to be in use
> > - * for a given file at a time. Changed the CONFIG_LOCK_MANDATORY scheme to
> > - * guarantee sensible behaviour in the case where file system modules might
> > - * be compiled with different options than the kernel itself.
> > - * Andy Walker (andy@lysaker.kvaerner.no), May 15, 1996.
> > - *
> > - * Added a couple of missing wake_up() calls. Thanks to Thomas Meckel
> > - * (Thomas.Meckel@mni.fh-giessen.de) for spotting this.
> > - * Andy Walker (andy@lysaker.kvaerner.no), May 15, 1996.
> > - *
> > - * Changed FL_POSIX locks to use the block list in the same way as FL_FLOCK
> > - * locks. Changed process synchronisation to avoid dereferencing locks that
> > - * have already been freed.
> > - * Andy Walker (andy@lysaker.kvaerner.no), Sep 21, 1996.
> > - *
> > - * Made the block list a circular list to minimise searching in the list.
> > - * Andy Walker (andy@lysaker.kvaerner.no), Sep 25, 1996.
> > - *
> > - * Made mandatory locking a mount option. Default is not to allow mandatory
> > - * locking.
> > - * Andy Walker (andy@lysaker.kvaerner.no), Oct 04, 1996.
> > - *
> > - * Some adaptations for NFS support.
> > - * Olaf Kirch (okir@monad.swb.de), Dec 1996,
> > - *
> > - * Fixed /proc/locks interface so that we can't overrun the buffer we are handed.
> > - * Andy Walker (andy@lysaker.kvaerner.no), May 12, 1997.
> > - *
> > - * Use slab allocator instead of kmalloc/kfree.
> > - * Use generic list implementation from <linux/list.h>.
> > - * Sped up posix_locks_deadlock by only considering blocked locks.
> > - * Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>, March, 2000.
> > - *
> > - * Leases and LOCK_MAND
> > - * Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>, June, 2000.
> > - * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, June, 2000.
> > *
> > * Locking conflicts and dependencies:
> > * If multiple threads attempt to lock the same byte (or flock the same file)
>
> Thanks, Bruce (and Mauro). Applied to the locks-next branch (and I
> dropped Mauro's patch that touched the same area). It should make v5.16.
Thanks! Yeah, it looks a lot cleaner without those changelog-style
comments.
>
> Cheers,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-20 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-19 8:03 [PATCH v3 00/23] Fix some issues at documentation Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-10-19 8:04 ` [PATCH v3 18/23] fs: remove a comment pointing to the removed mandatory-locking file Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-10-19 10:50 ` Jeff Layton
2021-10-19 14:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-10-19 15:46 ` Jeff Layton
2021-10-19 16:16 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-10-19 16:27 ` Jeff Layton
2021-10-19 17:38 ` [PATCH] locks: remove changelog comments J. Bruce Fields
2021-10-19 18:14 ` Jeff Layton
2021-10-20 5:50 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2021-10-19 16:53 ` [PATCH v3 00/23] Fix some issues at documentation Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211020065033.032c86f9@sal.lan \
--to=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).