From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Ariadne Conill <ariadne@dereferenced.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/exec: require argv[0] presence in do_execveat_common()
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:42:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202201252241.7309AE568F@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220126043947.10058-1-ariadne@dereferenced.org>
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 04:39:47AM +0000, Ariadne Conill wrote:
> The first argument to argv when used with execv family of calls is
> required to be the name of the program being executed, per POSIX.
>
> By validating this in do_execveat_common(), we can prevent execution
> of shellcode which invokes execv(2) family syscalls with argc < 1,
> a scenario which is disallowed by POSIX, thus providing a mitigation
> against CVE-2021-4034 and similar bugs in the future.
>
> The use of -EFAULT for this case is similar to other systems, such
> as FreeBSD and OpenBSD.
>
> Interestingly, Michael Kerrisk opened an issue about this in 2008,
> but there was no consensus to support fixing this issue then.
> Hopefully now that CVE-2021-4034 shows practical exploitative use
> of this bug in a shellcode, we can reconsider.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ariadne Conill <ariadne@dereferenced.org>
Yup. Agreed. For context:
https://www.qualys.com/2022/01/25/cve-2021-4034/pwnkit.txt
> ---
> fs/exec.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
> index 79f2c9483302..de0b832473ed 100644
> --- a/fs/exec.c
> +++ b/fs/exec.c
> @@ -1897,8 +1897,10 @@ static int do_execveat_common(int fd, struct filename *filename,
> }
>
> retval = count(argv, MAX_ARG_STRINGS);
> - if (retval < 0)
> + if (retval < 1) {
> + retval = -EFAULT;
> goto out_free;
> + }
There shouldn't be anything legitimate actually doing this in userspace.
-Kees
> bprm->argc = retval;
>
> retval = count(envp, MAX_ARG_STRINGS);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-26 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-26 4:39 [PATCH] fs/exec: require argv[0] presence in do_execveat_common() Ariadne Conill
2022-01-26 6:42 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-01-26 7:28 ` Kees Cook
2022-01-26 11:18 ` Ariadne Conill
2022-01-26 12:33 ` Heikki Kallasjoki
2022-01-26 23:57 ` Kees Cook
2022-01-27 0:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-01-26 16:59 ` David Laight
2022-01-26 13:27 ` Rich Felker
2022-01-26 14:46 ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-26 17:37 ` Ariadne Conill
2022-02-01 20:54 ` hypervis0r
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-01-26 15:02 Alexey Dobriyan
2022-01-27 0:00 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202201252241.7309AE568F@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=ariadne@dereferenced.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).