From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: "Magnus Groß" <magnus.gross@rwth-aachen.de>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] elf: Relax assumptions about vaddr ordering
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 08:50:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202201260845.FCBC0B5A06@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfF18Dy85mCntXrx@fractal.localdomain>
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 05:25:20PM +0100, Magnus Groß wrote:
> From ff4dde97e82727727bda711f2367c05663498b24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Magnus=20Gro=C3=9F?= <magnus.gross@rwth-aachen.de>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:35:07 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] elf: Relax assumptions about vaddr ordering
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> Commit 5f501d555653 ("binfmt_elf: reintroduce using
> MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE") introduced a regression, where the kernel now
> assumes that PT_LOAD segments are ordered by vaddr in load_elf_binary().
>
> Specifically consider an ELF binary with the following PT_LOAD segments:
>
> Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align
> LOAD 0x000000 0x08000000 0x08000000 0x474585 0x474585 R E 0x1000
> LOAD 0x475000 0x08475000 0x08475000 0x090a4 0xc6c10 RW 0x1000
> LOAD 0x47f000 0x00010000 0x00010000 0x00000 0x7ff0000 0x1000
>
> Note how the last segment is actually the first segment and vice versa.
>
> Since total_mapping_size() only computes the difference between the
> first and the last segment in the order that they appear, it will return
> a size of 0 in this case, thus causing load_elf_binary() to fail, which
> did not happen before that change.
>
> Strictly speaking total_mapping_size() made that assumption already
> before that patch, but the issue did not appear because the old
> load_addr_set guards never allowed this call to total_mapping_size().
>
> Instead of fixing this by reverting to the old load_addr_set logic, we
> fix this by comparing the correct first and last segments in
> total_mapping_size().
Ah, nice. Yeah, this is good.
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Groß <magnus.gross@rwth-aachen.de>
Fixes: 5f501d555653 ("binfmt_elf: reintroduce using MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-Kees
> ---
> fs/binfmt_elf.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> index f8c7f26f1fbb..0caaad9eddd1 100644
> --- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> +++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> @@ -402,19 +402,29 @@ static unsigned long elf_map(struct file *filep, unsigned long addr,
> static unsigned long total_mapping_size(const struct elf_phdr *cmds, int nr)
> {
> int i, first_idx = -1, last_idx = -1;
> + unsigned long min_vaddr = ULONG_MAX, max_vaddr = 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> if (cmds[i].p_type == PT_LOAD) {
> - last_idx = i;
> - if (first_idx == -1)
> + /*
> + * The PT_LOAD segments are not necessarily ordered
> + * by vaddr. Make sure that we get the segment with
> + * minimum vaddr (maximum vaddr respectively)
> + */
> + if (cmds[i].p_vaddr <= min_vaddr) {
> first_idx = i;
> + min_vaddr = cmds[i].p_vaddr;
> + }
> + if (cmds[i].p_vaddr >= max_vaddr) {
> + last_idx = i;
> + max_vaddr = cmds[i].p_vaddr;
> + }
> }
> }
> if (first_idx == -1)
> return 0;
>
> - return cmds[last_idx].p_vaddr + cmds[last_idx].p_memsz -
> - ELF_PAGESTART(cmds[first_idx].p_vaddr);
> + return max_vaddr + cmds[last_idx].p_memsz - ELF_PAGESTART(min_vaddr);
> }
>
> static int elf_read(struct file *file, void *buf, size_t len, loff_t pos)
> --
> 2.34.1
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-26 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-26 16:25 [PATCH] elf: Relax assumptions about vaddr ordering Magnus Groß
2022-01-26 16:50 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-01-27 6:31 ` Kees Cook
2022-01-28 8:26 ` Magnus Groß
2022-01-28 20:04 ` Kees Cook
2022-01-28 22:30 ` Kees Cook
2022-01-29 7:53 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2022-01-29 13:28 ` Magnus Groß
2022-02-01 22:48 ` Andrew Morton
2022-02-02 1:07 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-02 15:15 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2022-02-02 15:44 ` Magnus Groß
2022-02-01 22:44 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202201260845.FCBC0B5A06@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.gross@rwth-aachen.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).