linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Cc: mpatocka@redhat.com, javier@javigon.com, chaitanyak@nvidia.com,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
	msnitzer@redhat.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, hare@suse.de, kbusch@kernel.org,
	hch@lst.de, Frederick.Knight@netapp.com, osandov@fb.com,
	djwong@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, clm@fb.com,
	dsterba@suse.com, tytso@mit.edu, jack@suse.com,
	joshi.k@samsung.com, arnav.dawn@samsung.com,
	SelvaKumar S <selvakuma.s1@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] block: Add copy offload support infrastructure
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 15:52:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220209102208.GB7698@test-zns> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e976611-6ba1-f986-91ce-d7f59fe4dd47@opensource.wdc.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 13602 bytes --]

O Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 04:21:19PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2/7/22 23:13, Nitesh Shetty wrote:
> > Introduce blkdev_issue_copy which supports source and destination bdevs,
> > and a array of (source, destination and copy length) tuples.
> 
> s/a/an
>

acked

> > Introduce REQ_COP copy offload operation flag. Create a read-write
> 
> REQ_COPY ?
>

acked

> > bio pair with a token as payload and submitted to the device in order.
> > the read request populates token with source specific information which
> > is then passed with write request.
> > Ths design is courtsey Mikulas Patocka<mpatocka@>'s token based copy
> 
> s/Ths design is courtsey/This design is courtesy of
>

acked

> > 
> > Larger copy operation may be divided if necessary by looking at device
> > limits.
> 
> may or will ?
> by looking at -> depending on the ?
> 

Larger copy will be divided, based on max_copy_sectors,max_copy_range_sector
limits. Will add in next series.

> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: SelvaKumar S <selvakuma.s1@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Arnav Dawn <arnav.dawn@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  block/blk-lib.c           | 216 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  block/blk-settings.c      |   2 +
> >  block/blk.h               |   2 +
> >  include/linux/blk_types.h |  20 ++++
> >  include/linux/blkdev.h    |   3 +
> >  include/uapi/linux/fs.h   |  14 +++
> >  6 files changed, 257 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
> > index 1b8ced45e4e5..3ae2c27b566e 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-lib.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-lib.c
> > @@ -135,6 +135,222 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_issue_discard);
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * Wait on and process all in-flight BIOs.  This must only be called once
> > + * all bios have been issued so that the refcount can only decrease.
> > + * This just waits for all bios to make it through bio_copy_end_io. IO
> > + * errors are propagated through cio->io_error.
> > + */
> > +static int cio_await_completion(struct cio *cio)
> > +{
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	while (atomic_read(&cio->refcount)) {
> > +		cio->waiter = current;
> > +		__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> > +		blk_io_schedule();
> > +		/* wake up sets us TASK_RUNNING */
> > +		cio->waiter = NULL;
> > +		ret = cio->io_err;
> 
> Why is this in the loop ?
>

agree.

> > +	}
> > +	kvfree(cio);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void bio_copy_end_io(struct bio *bio)
> > +{
> > +	struct copy_ctx *ctx = bio->bi_private;
> > +	struct cio *cio = ctx->cio;
> > +	sector_t clen;
> > +	int ri = ctx->range_idx;
> > +
> > +	if (bio->bi_status) {
> > +		cio->io_err = bio->bi_status;
> > +		clen = (bio->bi_iter.bi_sector - ctx->start_sec) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > +		cio->rlist[ri].comp_len = min_t(sector_t, clen, cio->rlist[ri].comp_len);
> > +	}
> > +	__free_page(bio->bi_io_vec[0].bv_page);
> > +	kfree(ctx);
> > +	bio_put(bio);
> > +
> > +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&cio->refcount) && cio->waiter)
> > +		wake_up_process(cio->waiter);
> 
> This looks racy: the cio->waiter test and wakeup are not atomic.

agreed, will remove atomic for refcount and add if check and wakeup in locks
in next version.

> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * blk_copy_offload	- Use device's native copy offload feature
> > + * Go through user provide payload, prepare new payload based on device's copy offload limits.
> > + */
> > +int blk_copy_offload(struct block_device *src_bdev, int nr_srcs,
> > +		struct range_entry *rlist, struct block_device *dst_bdev, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > +{
> > +	struct request_queue *sq = bdev_get_queue(src_bdev);
> > +	struct request_queue *dq = bdev_get_queue(dst_bdev);
> > +	struct bio *read_bio, *write_bio;
> > +	struct copy_ctx *ctx;
> > +	struct cio *cio;
> > +	struct page *token;
> > +	sector_t src_blk, copy_len, dst_blk;
> > +	sector_t remaining, max_copy_len = LONG_MAX;
> > +	int ri = 0, ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	cio = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cio), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!cio)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +	atomic_set(&cio->refcount, 0);
> > +	cio->rlist = rlist;
> > +
> > +	max_copy_len = min3(max_copy_len, (sector_t)sq->limits.max_copy_sectors,
> > +			(sector_t)dq->limits.max_copy_sectors);
> 
> sq->limits.max_copy_sectors is already by definition smaller than
> LONG_MAX, so there is no need for the min3 here.
>

acked

> > +	max_copy_len = min3(max_copy_len, (sector_t)sq->limits.max_copy_range_sectors,
> > +			(sector_t)dq->limits.max_copy_range_sectors) << SECTOR_SHIFT;> +
> > +	for (ri = 0; ri < nr_srcs; ri++) {
> > +		cio->rlist[ri].comp_len = rlist[ri].len;
> > +		for (remaining = rlist[ri].len, src_blk = rlist[ri].src, dst_blk = rlist[ri].dst;
> > +			remaining > 0;
> > +			remaining -= copy_len, src_blk += copy_len, dst_blk += copy_len) {
> 
> This is unreadable.
> 

Sure, I will simplify the loops in next version.

> > +			copy_len = min(remaining, max_copy_len);
> > +
> > +			token = alloc_page(gfp_mask);
> > +			if (unlikely(!token)) {
> > +				ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +				goto err_token;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			read_bio = bio_alloc(src_bdev, 1, REQ_OP_READ | REQ_COPY | REQ_NOMERGE,
> > +					gfp_mask);
> > +			if (!read_bio) {
> > +				ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +				goto err_read_bio;
> > +			}
> > +			read_bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = src_blk >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > +			read_bio->bi_iter.bi_size = copy_len;
> > +			__bio_add_page(read_bio, token, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
> > +			ret = submit_bio_wait(read_bio);
> > +			if (ret) {
> > +				bio_put(read_bio);
> > +				goto err_read_bio;
> > +			}
> > +			bio_put(read_bio);
> > +			ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(struct copy_ctx), gfp_mask);
> > +			if (!ctx) {
> > +				ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +				goto err_read_bio;
> > +			}
> 
> This should be done before the read.
>

acked.

> > +			ctx->cio = cio;
> > +			ctx->range_idx = ri;
> > +			ctx->start_sec = rlist[ri].src;
> > +
> > +			write_bio = bio_alloc(dst_bdev, 1, REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_COPY | REQ_NOMERGE,
> > +					gfp_mask);
> > +			if (!write_bio) {
> > +				ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +				goto err_read_bio;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			write_bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = dst_blk >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > +			write_bio->bi_iter.bi_size = copy_len;
> > +			__bio_add_page(write_bio, token, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
> > +			write_bio->bi_end_io = bio_copy_end_io;
> > +			write_bio->bi_private = ctx;
> > +			atomic_inc(&cio->refcount);
> > +			submit_bio(write_bio);
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Wait for completion of all IO's*/
> > +	return cio_await_completion(cio);
> > +
> > +err_read_bio:
> > +	__free_page(token);
> > +err_token:
> > +	rlist[ri].comp_len = min_t(sector_t, rlist[ri].comp_len, (rlist[ri].len - remaining));
> > +
> > +	cio->io_err = ret;
> > +	return cio_await_completion(cio);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int blk_copy_sanity_check(struct block_device *src_bdev,
> > +		struct block_device *dst_bdev, struct range_entry *rlist, int nr)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int align_mask = max(
> > +			bdev_logical_block_size(dst_bdev), bdev_logical_block_size(src_bdev)) - 1;
> > +	sector_t len = 0;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> > +		if (rlist[i].len)
> > +			len += rlist[i].len;
> > +		else
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		if ((rlist[i].dst & align_mask) || (rlist[i].src & align_mask) ||
> > +				(rlist[i].len & align_mask))
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		rlist[i].comp_len = 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (!len && len >= MAX_COPY_TOTAL_LENGTH)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool blk_check_copy_offload(struct request_queue *src_q,
> > +		struct request_queue *dest_q)
> > +{
> > +	if (dest_q->limits.copy_offload == BLK_COPY_OFFLOAD &&
> > +			src_q->limits.copy_offload == BLK_COPY_OFFLOAD)
> > +		return true;
> > +
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * blkdev_issue_copy - queue a copy
> > + * @src_bdev:	source block device
> > + * @nr_srcs:	number of source ranges to copy
> > + * @src_rlist:	array of source ranges
> > + * @dest_bdev:	destination block device
> > + * @gfp_mask:   memory allocation flags (for bio_alloc)
> > + * @flags:	BLKDEV_COPY_* flags to control behaviour
> > + *
> > + * Description:
> > + *	Copy source ranges from source block device to destination block device.
> > + *	length of a source range cannot be zero.
> > + */
> > +int blkdev_issue_copy(struct block_device *src_bdev, int nr,
> > +		struct range_entry *rlist, struct block_device *dest_bdev,
> > +		gfp_t gfp_mask, int flags)
> > +{
> > +	struct request_queue *src_q = bdev_get_queue(src_bdev);
> > +	struct request_queue *dest_q = bdev_get_queue(dest_bdev);
> > +	int ret = -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (!src_q || !dest_q)
> > +		return -ENXIO;
> > +
> > +	if (!nr)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (nr >= MAX_COPY_NR_RANGE)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (bdev_read_only(dest_bdev))
> > +		return -EPERM;
> > +
> > +	ret = blk_copy_sanity_check(src_bdev, dest_bdev, rlist, nr);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	if (blk_check_copy_offload(src_q, dest_q))
> > +		ret = blk_copy_offload(src_bdev, nr, rlist, dest_bdev, gfp_mask);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_issue_copy);
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * __blkdev_issue_write_same - generate number of bios with same page
> >   * @bdev:	target blockdev
> > diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
> > index 818454552cf8..4c8d48b8af25 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> > @@ -545,6 +545,8 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b,
> >  	t->max_segment_size = min_not_zero(t->max_segment_size,
> >  					   b->max_segment_size);
> >  
> > +	t->max_copy_sectors = min_not_zero(t->max_copy_sectors, b->max_copy_sectors);
> 
> Why min_not_zero ? If one of the underlying drive does not support copy
> offload, you cannot report that the top drive does.
>

agreed. Will update in next series.

> > +
> >  	t->misaligned |= b->misaligned;
> >  
> >  	alignment = queue_limit_alignment_offset(b, start);
> > diff --git a/block/blk.h b/block/blk.h
> > index abb663a2a147..94d2b055750b 100644
> > --- a/block/blk.h
> > +++ b/block/blk.h
> > @@ -292,6 +292,8 @@ static inline bool blk_may_split(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
> >  		break;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	if (unlikely(op_is_copy(bio->bi_opf)))
> > +		return false;
> >  	/*
> >  	 * All drivers must accept single-segments bios that are <= PAGE_SIZE.
> >  	 * This is a quick and dirty check that relies on the fact that
> > diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> > index 5561e58d158a..0a3fee8ad61c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> > @@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ enum req_flag_bits {
> >  	/* for driver use */
> >  	__REQ_DRV,
> >  	__REQ_SWAP,		/* swapping request. */
> > +	__REQ_COPY,		/* copy request*/
> >  	__REQ_NR_BITS,		/* stops here */
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -442,6 +443,7 @@ enum req_flag_bits {
> >  
> >  #define REQ_DRV			(1ULL << __REQ_DRV)
> >  #define REQ_SWAP		(1ULL << __REQ_SWAP)
> > +#define REQ_COPY		(1ULL << __REQ_COPY)
> >  
> >  #define REQ_FAILFAST_MASK \
> >  	(REQ_FAILFAST_DEV | REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT | REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER)
> > @@ -498,6 +500,11 @@ static inline bool op_is_discard(unsigned int op)
> >  	return (op & REQ_OP_MASK) == REQ_OP_DISCARD;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline bool op_is_copy(unsigned int op)
> > +{
> > +	return (op & REQ_COPY);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Check if a bio or request operation is a zone management operation, with
> >   * the exception of REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL which is treated as a special case
> > @@ -532,4 +539,17 @@ struct blk_rq_stat {
> >  	u64 batch;
> >  };
> >  
> > +struct cio {
> > +	atomic_t refcount;
> > +	blk_status_t io_err;
> > +	struct range_entry *rlist;
> > +	struct task_struct *waiter;     /* waiting task (NULL if none) */
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct copy_ctx {
> > +	int range_idx;
> > +	sector_t start_sec;
> > +	struct cio *cio;
> > +};
> > +
> >  #endif /* __LINUX_BLK_TYPES_H */
> > diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > index f63ae50f1de3..15597488040c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > @@ -1120,6 +1120,9 @@ extern int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
> >  		struct bio **biop);
> >  struct bio *bio_map_kern(struct request_queue *q, void *data, unsigned int len,
> >  		gfp_t gfp_mask);
> > +int blkdev_issue_copy(struct block_device *src_bdev, int nr_srcs,
> > +		struct range_entry *src_rlist, struct block_device *dest_bdev,
> > +		gfp_t gfp_mask, int flags);
> >  
> >  #define BLKDEV_ZERO_NOUNMAP	(1 << 0)  /* do not free blocks */
> >  #define BLKDEV_ZERO_NOFALLBACK	(1 << 1)  /* don't write explicit zeroes */
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> > index bdf7b404b3e7..55bca8f6e8ed 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> > @@ -64,6 +64,20 @@ struct fstrim_range {
> >  	__u64 minlen;
> >  };
> >  
> > +/* Maximum no of entries supported */
> > +#define MAX_COPY_NR_RANGE	(1 << 12)
> > +
> > +/* maximum total copy length */
> > +#define MAX_COPY_TOTAL_LENGTH	(1 << 21)
> > +
> > +/* Source range entry for copy */
> > +struct range_entry {
> > +	__u64 src;
> > +	__u64 dst;
> > +	__u64 len;
> > +	__u64 comp_len;
> > +};
> > +
> >  /* extent-same (dedupe) ioctls; these MUST match the btrfs ioctl definitions */
> >  #define FILE_DEDUPE_RANGE_SAME		0
> >  #define FILE_DEDUPE_RANGE_DIFFERS	1
> 
> 
> -- 
> Damien Le Moal
> Western Digital Research
>

 -- 
Thank you
Nitesh

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]



  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-09 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20220127071544uscas1p2f70f4d2509f3ebd574b7ed746d3fa551@uscas1p2.samsung.com>
2022-01-27  7:14 ` [LSF/MM/BFP ATTEND] [LSF/MM/BFP TOPIC] Storage: Copy Offload Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-01-28 19:59   ` Adam Manzanares
2022-01-31 11:49     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-01-31 19:03   ` Bart Van Assche
2022-02-01  1:54   ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-02-01 10:21   ` Javier González
2022-02-01 18:31     ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] NVMe copy offload patches Mikulas Patocka
2022-02-01 18:32       ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] block: add copy offload support Mikulas Patocka
2022-02-01 19:18         ` Bart Van Assche
2022-02-03 18:50           ` Mikulas Patocka
2022-02-03 20:11             ` Keith Busch
2022-02-03 22:49             ` Bart Van Assche
2022-02-04 12:09               ` Mikulas Patocka
2022-02-04 13:34                 ` Jens Axboe
2022-02-02 16:21         ` Keith Busch
2022-02-02 16:40           ` Mikulas Patocka
2022-02-02 18:40           ` Knight, Frederick
2022-02-01 18:33       ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] nvme: " Mikulas Patocka
2022-02-01 19:18         ` Bart Van Assche
2022-02-01 19:25           ` Mikulas Patocka
2022-02-01 18:33       ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] nvme: add the "debug" host driver Mikulas Patocka
2022-02-02  6:01         ` Adam Manzanares
2022-02-03 16:06           ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-02-03 16:15             ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-03 19:34               ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-02-03 19:46                 ` Adam Manzanares
2022-02-03 20:57                 ` Mikulas Patocka
2022-02-03 22:52                   ` Adam Manzanares
2022-02-04  3:00                   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-02-04  3:05             ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-02-02  8:00         ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-02-02 12:38           ` Klaus Jensen
2022-02-03 15:38           ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-02-03 16:52             ` Keith Busch
2022-02-03 19:50               ` Adam Manzanares
2022-02-04  3:12                 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-02-04  6:28                   ` Damien Le Moal
2022-02-04  7:58                     ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-02-04  8:24                       ` Javier González
2022-02-04  9:58                         ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-02-04 11:34                           ` Javier González
2022-02-04 14:15                           ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-02-04 14:24                             ` Keith Busch
2022-02-04 16:01                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-04 19:41       ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] NVMe copy offload patches Nitesh Shetty
     [not found]         ` <CGME20220207141901epcas5p162ec2387815be7a1fd67ce0ab7082119@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2022-02-07 14:13           ` [PATCH v2 00/10] Add Copy offload support Nitesh Shetty
     [not found]             ` <CGME20220207141908epcas5p4f270c89fc32434ea8b525fa973098231@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-02-07 14:13               ` [PATCH v2 01/10] block: make bio_map_kern() non static Nitesh Shetty
     [not found]             ` <CGME20220207141913epcas5p4d41cb549b7cca1ede5c7a66bbd110da0@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-02-07 14:13               ` [PATCH v2 02/10] block: Introduce queue limits for copy-offload support Nitesh Shetty
2022-02-08  7:01                 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-02-08 18:43                   ` Nitesh Shetty
     [not found]             ` <CGME20220207141918epcas5p4f9badc0c3f3f0913f091c850d2d3bd81@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-02-07 14:13               ` [PATCH v2 03/10] block: Add copy offload support infrastructure Nitesh Shetty
2022-02-07 22:45                 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-07 23:26                 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-08  7:21                 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-02-09 10:22                   ` Nitesh Shetty [this message]
2022-02-09  7:48                 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-09 10:32                   ` Nitesh Shetty
     [not found]             ` <CGME20220207141924epcas5p26ad9cf5de732224f408aded12ed0a577@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-02-07 14:13               ` [PATCH v2 04/10] block: Introduce a new ioctl for copy Nitesh Shetty
2022-02-09  3:39                 ` kernel test robot
     [not found]             ` <CGME20220207141930epcas5p2bcbff65f78ad1dede64648d73ddb3770@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-02-07 14:13               ` [PATCH v2 05/10] block: add emulation " Nitesh Shetty
2022-02-08  3:20                 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-16 13:32                 ` Mikulas Patocka
2022-02-17 13:18                   ` Nitesh Shetty
     [not found]             ` <CGME20220207141937epcas5p2bd57ae35056c69b3e2f9ee2348d6af19@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-02-07 14:13               ` [PATCH v2 06/10] nvme: add copy support Nitesh Shetty
2022-02-10  7:08                 ` kernel test robot
     [not found]             ` <CGME20220207141942epcas5p4bda894a5833513c9211dcecc7928a951@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-02-07 14:13               ` [PATCH v2 07/10] nvmet: add copy command support for bdev and file ns Nitesh Shetty
2022-02-07 18:10                 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-07 20:12                 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-10  8:31                 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11  7:52                 ` Dan Carpenter
     [not found]             ` <CGME20220207141948epcas5p4534f6bdc5a1e2e676d7d09c04f8b4a5b@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-02-07 14:13               ` [PATCH v2 08/10] dm: Add support for copy offload Nitesh Shetty
2022-02-16 13:51                 ` Mikulas Patocka
2022-02-24 12:42                   ` Nitesh Shetty
2022-02-25  9:12                     ` Mikulas Patocka
     [not found]             ` <CGME20220207141953epcas5p32ccc3c0bbe642cea074edefcc32302a5@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-02-07 14:13               ` [PATCH v2 09/10] dm: Enable copy offload for dm-linear target Nitesh Shetty
     [not found]             ` <CGME20220207141958epcas5p25f1cd06726217696d13c2dfbea010565@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-02-07 14:13               ` [PATCH v2 10/10] dm kcopyd: use copy offload support Nitesh Shetty
2022-02-07  9:57     ` [LSF/MM/BFP ATTEND] [LSF/MM/BFP TOPIC] Storage: Copy Offload Nitesh Shetty
2022-02-02  5:57   ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-02-07 10:45   ` David Disseldorp
2022-03-01 17:34   ` Nikos Tsironis
2022-03-01 21:32     ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-03-03 18:36       ` Nikos Tsironis
2022-03-08 20:48       ` Nikos Tsironis
2022-03-09  8:51         ` Mikulas Patocka
2022-03-09 15:49           ` Nikos Tsironis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220209102208.GB7698@test-zns \
    --to=nj.shetty@samsung.com \
    --cc=Frederick.Knight@netapp.com \
    --cc=arnav.dawn@samsung.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=javier@javigon.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=msnitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=selvakuma.s1@samsung.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).