From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54DEC43217 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 23:37:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229739AbiCDXht (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2022 18:37:49 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33266 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229724AbiCDXhr (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2022 18:37:47 -0500 Received: from lgeamrelo11.lge.com (lgeamrelo12.lge.com [156.147.23.52]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DFB1C8857 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 15:36:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from unknown (HELO lgemrelse6q.lge.com) (156.147.1.121) by 156.147.23.52 with ESMTP; 5 Mar 2022 08:36:56 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.121 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com Received: from unknown (HELO X58A-UD3R) (10.177.244.38) by 156.147.1.121 with ESMTP; 5 Mar 2022 08:36:56 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.244.38 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 08:36:33 +0900 From: Byungchul Park To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, will@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, sashal@kernel.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, duyuyang@gmail.com, johannes.berg@intel.com, tj@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, willy@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com, amir73il@gmail.com, bfields@fieldses.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-team@lge.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, minchan@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, sj@kernel.org, jglisse@redhat.com, dennis@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz, ngupta@vflare.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, paolo.valente@linaro.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, jack@suse.com, jlayton@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, hch@infradead.org, djwong@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, airlied@linux.ie, rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com, melissa.srw@gmail.com, hamohammed.sa@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 16/24] locking/lockdep, cpu/hotplus: Use a weaker annotation in AP thread Message-ID: <20220304233633.GA31304@X58A-UD3R> References: <1646377603-19730-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> <1646377603-19730-17-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:28:57PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > On 3/4/22 10:06 AM, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > cb92173d1f0 (locking/lockdep, cpu/hotplug: Annotate AP thread) was > > You need to enclose the commit summary in (""), not just (). :-) Thank you! I will! > > introduced to make lockdep_assert_cpus_held() work in AP thread. > > > > However, the annotation is too strong for that purpose. We don't have to > > use more than try lock annotation for that. > > > > Furthermore, now that Dept was introduced, false positive alarms was > > reported by that. Replaced it with try lock annotation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park > [...] > > MBR, Sergey