From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19FBC433EF for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 19:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245756AbiCJTPy (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2022 14:15:54 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58994 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236196AbiCJTPw (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2022 14:15:52 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 900B615AF02; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:14:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id B24FF68AFE; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 20:14:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 20:14:45 +0100 From: "hch@lst.de" To: "Luca Porzio (lporzio)" Cc: "hch@lst.de" , Manjong Lee , "david@fromorbit.com" , "axboe@kernel.dk" , "kbusch@kernel.org" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" , "sagi@grimberg.me" , "song@kernel.org" , "seunghwan.hyun@samsung.com" , "sookwan7.kim@samsung.com" , "nanich.lee@samsung.com" , "woosung2.lee@samsung.com" , "yt0928.kim@samsung.com" , "junho89.kim@samsung.com" , "jisoo2146.oh@samsung.com" Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: remove the per-bio/request write hint. Message-ID: <20220310191445.GA7338@lst.de> References: <20220306231727.GP3927073@dread.disaster.area> <20220309133119.6915-1-mj0123.lee@samsung.com> <20220310142148.GA1069@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 06:51:39PM +0000, Luca Porzio (lporzio) wrote: > You are starting from the wrong assumption: I'm just saying this is not dead code > but it is used across the (Android) ecosystem. No one gives cares about random forks, so no I'm not starting from the wrong assumptіon. You on the other hand seem to have a lot of learning to do if you thing some random kernel fork matters the slightest about what is considered dead code.