From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
Cc: chuck.lever@oracle.com, jlayton@redhat.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v16 05/11] NFSD: Update nfs4_get_vfs_file() to handle courtesy clients
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:39:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220315153928.GC19168@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1647051215-2873-6-git-send-email-dai.ngo@oracle.com>
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 06:13:29PM -0800, Dai Ngo wrote:
> Update nfs4_get_vfs_file and nfs4_upgrade_open to handle share
> reservation conflict with courtesy client.
>
> If share/access check fails with share denied then check if the
> the conflict was caused by courtesy clients. If that's the case
> then set CLIENT_EXPIRED flag to expire the courtesy clients and
> allow nfs4_get_vfs_file to continue. Client with CLIENT_EXPIRED
> is expired by the laundromat.
I'm not following this code. I'll see if I can give it another shot
tomorrow, but are you sure it can't be simplified somehow?
Keep in mind, we really don't care about share conflicts much. I'm not
sure whether anyone actually uses open deny modes, so there's no need to
optimize that case. I'd be totally fine with expiring things
unnecessarily in the deny mode case, for example.
--b.
> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 2beb0972de88..b16f689f34c3 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -4973,9 +4973,75 @@ nfsd4_truncate(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fh,
> return nfsd_setattr(rqstp, fh, &iattr, 0, (time64_t)0);
> }
>
> +static bool
> +nfs4_check_access_deny_bmap(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp, u32 access,
> + bool share_access)
> +{
> + if (share_access) {
> + if (!stp->st_deny_bmap)
> + return false;
> +
> + if ((stp->st_deny_bmap & (1 << NFS4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH)) ||
> + (access & NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ &&
> + stp->st_deny_bmap & (1 << NFS4_SHARE_DENY_READ)) ||
> + (access & NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE &&
> + stp->st_deny_bmap & (1 << NFS4_SHARE_DENY_WRITE))) {
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> + }
> + if ((access & NFS4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH) ||
> + (access & NFS4_SHARE_DENY_READ &&
> + stp->st_access_bmap & (1 << NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ)) ||
> + (access & NFS4_SHARE_DENY_WRITE &&
> + stp->st_access_bmap & (1 << NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE))) {
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Check whether courtesy clients have conflicting access
> + *
> + * access: is op_share_access if share_access is true.
> + * Check if access mode, op_share_access, would conflict with
> + * the current deny mode of the file 'fp'.
> + * access: is op_share_deny if share_access is false.
> + * Check if the deny mode, op_share_deny, would conflict with
> + * current access of the file 'fp'.
> + * stp: skip checking this entry.
> + * new_stp: normal open, not open upgrade.
> + *
> + * Function returns:
> + * true - access/deny mode conflict with normal client.
> + * false - no conflict or conflict with courtesy client(s) is resolved.
> + */
> +static bool
> +nfs4_resolve_deny_conflicts_locked(struct nfs4_file *fp, bool new_stp,
> + struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp, u32 access, bool share_access)
> +{
> + struct nfs4_ol_stateid *st;
> + struct nfs4_client *clp;
> + bool conflict = false;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&fp->fi_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(st, &fp->fi_stateids, st_perfile) {
> + if (st->st_openstp || (st == stp && new_stp) ||
> + (!nfs4_check_access_deny_bmap(st,
> + access, share_access)))
> + continue;
> + clp = st->st_stid.sc_client;
> + if (nfs4_check_and_expire_courtesy_client(clp))
> + continue;
> + conflict = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + return conflict;
> +}
> +
> static __be32 nfs4_get_vfs_file(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfs4_file *fp,
> struct svc_fh *cur_fh, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp,
> - struct nfsd4_open *open)
> + struct nfsd4_open *open, bool new_stp)
> {
> struct nfsd_file *nf = NULL;
> __be32 status;
> @@ -4991,15 +5057,29 @@ static __be32 nfs4_get_vfs_file(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfs4_file *fp,
> */
> status = nfs4_file_check_deny(fp, open->op_share_deny);
> if (status != nfs_ok) {
> - spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> - goto out;
> + if (status != nfserr_share_denied) {
> + spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (nfs4_resolve_deny_conflicts_locked(fp, new_stp,
> + stp, open->op_share_deny, false)) {
> + spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
>
> /* set access to the file */
> status = nfs4_file_get_access(fp, open->op_share_access);
> if (status != nfs_ok) {
> - spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> - goto out;
> + if (status != nfserr_share_denied) {
> + spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (nfs4_resolve_deny_conflicts_locked(fp, new_stp,
> + stp, open->op_share_access, true)) {
> + spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
>
> /* Set access bits in stateid */
> @@ -5050,7 +5130,7 @@ nfs4_upgrade_open(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfs4_file *fp, struct svc_fh *c
> unsigned char old_deny_bmap = stp->st_deny_bmap;
>
> if (!test_access(open->op_share_access, stp))
> - return nfs4_get_vfs_file(rqstp, fp, cur_fh, stp, open);
> + return nfs4_get_vfs_file(rqstp, fp, cur_fh, stp, open, false);
>
> /* test and set deny mode */
> spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
> @@ -5059,7 +5139,10 @@ nfs4_upgrade_open(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfs4_file *fp, struct svc_fh *c
> set_deny(open->op_share_deny, stp);
> fp->fi_share_deny |=
> (open->op_share_deny & NFS4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH);
> - }
> + } else if (status == nfserr_share_denied &&
> + !nfs4_resolve_deny_conflicts_locked(fp, false, stp,
> + open->op_share_deny, false))
> + status = nfs_ok;
> spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
>
> if (status != nfs_ok)
> @@ -5399,7 +5482,7 @@ nfsd4_process_open2(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nf
> goto out;
> }
> } else {
> - status = nfs4_get_vfs_file(rqstp, fp, current_fh, stp, open);
> + status = nfs4_get_vfs_file(rqstp, fp, current_fh, stp, open, true);
> if (status) {
> stp->st_stid.sc_type = NFS4_CLOSED_STID;
> release_open_stateid(stp);
> --
> 2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-15 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-12 2:13 [PATCH RFC v16 0/11] NFSD: Initial implementation of NFSv4 Courteous Server Dai Ngo
2022-03-12 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC v16 01/11] fs/lock: add helper locks_owner_has_blockers to check for blockers Dai Ngo
2022-03-16 14:27 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-03-16 17:46 ` dai.ngo
2022-03-12 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC v16 02/11] NFSD: Add client flags, macro and spinlock to support courteous server Dai Ngo
2022-03-12 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC v16 03/11] NFSD: Add lm_lock_expired call out Dai Ngo
2022-03-15 15:02 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-03-15 16:26 ` dai.ngo
2022-03-15 17:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-03-15 17:30 ` dai.ngo
2022-03-15 17:39 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-03-15 18:56 ` dai.ngo
2022-03-12 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC v16 04/11] NFSD: Update nfsd_breaker_owns_lease() to handle courtesy clients Dai Ngo
2022-03-13 16:04 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-03-15 15:13 ` Bruce Fields
2022-03-15 16:27 ` dai.ngo
2022-03-12 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC v16 05/11] NFSD: Update nfs4_get_vfs_file() " Dai Ngo
2022-03-15 15:39 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2022-03-16 6:29 ` dai.ngo
2022-03-12 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC v16 06/11] NFSD: Update find_clp_in_name_tree() " Dai Ngo
2022-03-12 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC v16 07/11] NFSD: Update find_in_sessionid_hashtbl() " Dai Ngo
2022-03-12 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC v16 08/11] NFSD: Update find_client_in_id_table() " Dai Ngo
2022-03-12 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC v16 09/11] NFSD: Refactor nfsd4_laundromat() Dai Ngo
2022-03-12 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC v16 10/11] NFSD: Update laundromat to handle courtesy clients Dai Ngo
2022-03-12 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC v16 11/11] NFSD: Show state of courtesy clients in client info Dai Ngo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220315153928.GC19168@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).