From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@huawei.com>
Cc: willy@infradead.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
houtao1@huawei.com, fangwei1@huawei.com,
hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: fix an infinite loop in iomap_fiemap
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 15:05:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220317220511.GA8182@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220315065745.3441989-1-guoxuenan@huawei.com>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 02:57:45PM +0800, Guo Xuenan wrote:
> when get fiemap starting from MAX_LFS_FILESIZE, (maxbytes - *len) < start
> will always true , then *len set zero. because of start offset is byhond
> file size, for erofs filesystem it will always return iomap.length with
> zero,iomap iterate will be infinite loop.
>
> In order to avoid this situation, it is better to calculate the actual
> mapping length at first. If the len is 0, there is no need to continue
> the operation.
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 905 at fs/iomap/iter.c:35 iomap_iter+0x97f/0xc70
> Modules linked in: xfs erofs
> CPU: 7 PID: 905 Comm: iomap Tainted: G W 5.17.0-rc8 #27
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:iomap_iter+0x97f/0xc70
> Code: 85 a1 fc ff ff e8 71 be 9c ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 e9 92 fc ff ff e8 62 be 9c ff 0f 0b b8 fb ff ff ff e9 fc f8 ff ff e8 51 be 9c ff <0f> 0b e9 2b fc ff ff e8 45 be 9c ff 0f 0b e9 e1 fb ff ff e8 39 be
> RSP: 0018:ffff888060a37ab0 EFLAGS: 00010293
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888060a37bb0 RCX: 0000000000000000
> RDX: ffff88807e19a900 RSI: ffffffff81a7da7f RDI: ffff888060a37be0
> RBP: 7fffffffffffffff R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff888060a37c20
> R10: ffff888060a37c67 R11: ffffed100c146f8c R12: 7fffffffffffffff
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff888060a37bd8 R15: ffff888060a37c20
> FS: 00007fd3cca01540(0000) GS:ffff888108780000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000000020010820 CR3: 0000000054b92000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> iomap_fiemap+0x1c9/0x2f0
> erofs_fiemap+0x64/0x90 [erofs]
> do_vfs_ioctl+0x40d/0x12e0
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0xaa/0x1c0
> do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> </TASK>
> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7 stuck for 26s! [iomap:905]
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/ioctl.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ioctl.c b/fs/ioctl.c
> index 1ed097e94af2..7f70e90766ed 100644
> --- a/fs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/ioctl.c
> @@ -171,8 +171,6 @@ int fiemap_prep(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
> u32 incompat_flags;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (*len == 0)
> - return -EINVAL;
> if (start > maxbytes)
> return -EFBIG;
>
> @@ -182,6 +180,9 @@ int fiemap_prep(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
> if (*len > maxbytes || (maxbytes - *len) < start)
> *len = maxbytes - start;
>
> + if (*len == 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
Looks fine to me (and I don't even really mind pulling this in) but this
isn't a patch to fs/iomap/ -- doesn't the same issue potentially affect
the fiemap implementations that do not use iomap?
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> +
> supported_flags |= FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC;
> supported_flags &= FIEMAP_FLAGS_COMPAT;
> incompat_flags = fieinfo->fi_flags & ~supported_flags;
> --
> 2.22.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-17 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-15 6:57 [PATCH] iomap: fix an infinite loop in iomap_fiemap Guo Xuenan
2022-03-15 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-15 8:04 ` Gao Xiang
2022-03-15 8:59 ` Guo Xuenan
2022-03-17 22:05 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-03-18 7:21 ` Guo Xuenan
2022-03-20 16:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-03-29 3:29 ` [PATCH v2] fs: " Guo Xuenan
2022-03-29 6:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220317220511.GA8182@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fangwei1@huawei.com \
--cc=guoxuenan@huawei.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).