From: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
To: "NeilBrown" <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: "Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: filename_create(): fix incorrect intent.
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:49:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220331114949.02fae137@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <164868118815.25542.13263176689793254608@noble.neil.brown.name>
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:59:48 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022, David Disseldorp wrote:
> > Hi Neil,
> >
> > I gave this a spin and was wondering why xfstests wouldn't start with
> > this change...
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:56:48 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > ...
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> > > index 3f1829b3ab5b..3ffb42e56a8e 100644
> > > --- a/fs/namei.c
> > > +++ b/fs/namei.c
> > > @@ -3676,7 +3676,6 @@ static struct dentry *filename_create(int dfd, struct filename *name,
> > > int type;
> > > int err2;
> > > int error;
> > > - bool is_dir = (lookup_flags & LOOKUP_DIRECTORY);
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Note that only LOOKUP_REVAL and LOOKUP_DIRECTORY matter here. Any
> > > @@ -3698,9 +3697,11 @@ static struct dentry *filename_create(int dfd, struct filename *name,
> > > /* don't fail immediately if it's r/o, at least try to report other errors */
> > > err2 = mnt_want_write(path->mnt);
> > > /*
> > > - * Do the final lookup.
> > > + * Do the final lookup. Request 'create' only if there is no trailing
> > > + * '/', or if directory is requested.
> > > */
> > > - lookup_flags |= LOOKUP_CREATE | LOOKUP_EXCL;
> > > + if (!last.name[last.len] || (lookup_flags & LOOKUP_DIRECTORY))
> > > + lookup_flags |= LOOKUP_CREATE | LOOKUP_EXCL;
> >
> > This doesn't look right, as any LOOKUP_DIRECTORY flag gets dropped via
> > the prior "lookup_flags &= LOOKUP_REVAL;".
>
> Arg.. thanks for testing - I clearly should have tested more broadly.
>
> I could leave the "is_dir" variable there I guess.
> Or maybe the masking statement should be
> lookup_flags &= LOOKUP_REVAL | LOOKUP_DIRECTORY;
> as that is a better match for the comment.
Modifying "lookup_flags" results in changed filename_parentat() and
__lookup_hash() parameters, which isn't an intended consequence IIUC. I
think retaining "is_dir" would make sense.
Cheers, David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-31 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-28 0:56 [PATCH] VFS: filename_create(): fix incorrect intent NeilBrown
2022-03-29 15:29 ` Jeff Layton
2022-03-30 8:14 ` David Disseldorp
2022-03-30 22:59 ` NeilBrown
2022-03-31 9:49 ` David Disseldorp [this message]
2022-03-31 10:40 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220331114949.02fae137@suse.de \
--to=ddiss@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).