From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
david@fromorbit.com, djwong@kernel.org, jlayton@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] vfs: strip file's S_ISGID mode on vfs instead of on underlying filesystem
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:45:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220414124552.4uf3hpopqa4xlwrd@wittgenstein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1649923039-2273-2-git-send-email-xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 03:57:18PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote:
> Currently, vfs only passes mode argument to filesystem, then use inode_init_owner()
> to strip S_ISGID. Some filesystem(ie ext4/btrfs) will call inode_init_owner
> firstly, then posxi acl setup, but xfs uses the contrary order. It will affect
> S_ISGID clear especially we filter S_IXGRP by umask or acl.
>
> Regardless of which filesystem is in use, failure to strip the SGID correctly is
> considered a security failure that needs to be fixed. The current VFS infrastructure
> requires the filesystem to do everything right and not step on any landmines to
> strip the SGID bit, when in fact it can easily be done at the VFS and the filesystems
> then don't even need to be aware that the SGID needs to be (or has been stripped) by
> the operation the user asked to be done.
>
> Vfs has all the info it needs - it doesn't need the filesystems to do everything
> correctly with the mode and ensuring that they order things like posix acl setup
> functions correctly with inode_init_owner() to strip the SGID bit.
>
> Just strip the SGID bit at the VFS, and then the filesystems can't get it wrong.
>
> Also, the inode_sgid_strip() api should be used before IS_POSIXACL() because
> this api may change mode.
>
> Only the following places use inode_init_owner
> "hugetlbfs/inode.c:846: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
> nilfs2/inode.c:354: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
> zonefs/super.c:1289: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, parent, S_IFDIR | 0555);
> reiserfs/namei.c:619: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
> jfs/jfs_inode.c:67: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, parent, mode);
> f2fs/namei.c:50: inode_init_owner(mnt_userns, inode, dir, mode);
> ext2/ialloc.c:549: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
> overlayfs/dir.c:643: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dentry->d_parent->d_inode, mode);
> ufs/ialloc.c:292: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
> ntfs3/inode.c:1283: inode_init_owner(mnt_userns, inode, dir, mode);
> ramfs/inode.c:64: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
> 9p/vfs_inode.c:263: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, NULL, mode);
> btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c:65: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, NULL, S_IFREG);
> btrfs/inode.c:6215: inode_init_owner(mnt_userns, inode, dir, mode);
> sysv/ialloc.c:166: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
> omfs/inode.c:51: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, NULL, mode);
> ubifs/dir.c:97: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
> udf/ialloc.c:108: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
> ext4/ialloc.c:979: inode_init_owner(mnt_userns, inode, dir, mode);
> hfsplus/inode.c:393: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
> xfs/xfs_inode.c:840: inode_init_owner(mnt_userns, inode, dir, mode);
> ocfs2/dlmfs/dlmfs.c:331: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, NULL, mode);
> ocfs2/dlmfs/dlmfs.c:354: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, parent, mode);
> ocfs2/namei.c:200: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
> minix/bitmap.c:255: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
> bfs/dir.c:99: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
> "
For completeness sake, there's also spufs which doesn't really go
through the regular VFS callpath because it has separate system calls
like:
SYSCALL_DEFINE4(spu_create, const char __user *, name, unsigned int, flags,
umode_t, mode, int, neighbor_fd)
but looking through the code it only allows the creation of directories and only
allows bits in 0777.
>
> They are used in filesystem init new inode function and these init inode functions are used
> by following operations:
> mkdir
> symlink
> mknod
> create
> tmpfile
> rename
>
> We don't care about mkdir because we don't strip SGID bit for directory except fs.xfs.irix_sgid_inherit.
> symlink and rename only use valid mode that doesn't have SGID bit.
>
> We have added inode_sgid_strip api for the remaining operations.
>
> In addition to the above six operations, two filesystems has a little difference
> 1) btrfs has btrfs_create_subvol_root to create new inode but used non SGID bit mode and can ignore
> 2) ocfs2 reflink function should add inode_sgid_strip api manually because we don't add it in vfs
>
> Last but not least, this patch also changed grpid behaviour for ext4/xfs because the mode passed to
> them may been changed by inode_sgid_strip.
I think the patch itself is useful as it would move a security sensitive
operation that is currently burried in individual filesystems into the
vfs layer. But it has a decent regression potential since it might trip
filesystems that have so far relied on getting the S_ISGID bit with a
mode argument. The example being network filesystems that Jeff brought
up earlier. So this needs a lot of testing and long exposure in -next
for at least one full kernel cycle imho.
>
> Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/inode.c | 4 ----
> fs/namei.c | 5 ++++-
> fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> index d63264998855..b08bdd73e116 100644
> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -2246,10 +2246,6 @@ void inode_init_owner(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode,
> /* Directories are special, and always inherit S_ISGID */
> if (S_ISDIR(mode))
> mode |= S_ISGID;
> - else if ((mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP) &&
> - !in_group_p(i_gid_into_mnt(mnt_userns, dir)) &&
> - !capable_wrt_inode_uidgid(mnt_userns, dir, CAP_FSETID))
> - mode &= ~S_ISGID;
> } else
> inode_fsgid_set(inode, mnt_userns);
> inode->i_mode = mode;
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index 3f1829b3ab5b..e03f7defdd30 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -3287,6 +3287,7 @@ static struct dentry *lookup_open(struct nameidata *nd, struct file *file,
> if (open_flag & O_CREAT) {
> if (open_flag & O_EXCL)
> open_flag &= ~O_TRUNC;
> + inode_sgid_strip(mnt_userns, dir->d_inode, &mode);
> if (!IS_POSIXACL(dir->d_inode))
> mode &= ~current_umask();
> if (likely(got_write))
> @@ -3521,6 +3522,7 @@ struct dentry *vfs_tmpfile(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> child = d_alloc(dentry, &slash_name);
> if (unlikely(!child))
> goto out_err;
> + inode_sgid_strip(mnt_userns, dir, &mode);
Hm, an additional question: how is umask stripping currently handled in
vfs_tmpfile()? I don't see it anywhere. That seems like a bug?
> error = dir->i_op->tmpfile(mnt_userns, dir, child, mode);
> if (error)
> goto out_err;
> @@ -3850,13 +3852,14 @@ static int do_mknodat(int dfd, struct filename *name, umode_t mode,
> if (IS_ERR(dentry))
> goto out1;
>
> + mnt_userns = mnt_user_ns(path.mnt);
> + inode_sgid_strip(mnt_userns, path.dentry->d_inode, &mode);
> if (!IS_POSIXACL(path.dentry->d_inode))
> mode &= ~current_umask();
It would be worth to add another helper prepare_mode() that calls
inode_sgid_strip() and does the umask stripping as well and then call it
in all these places. You should even call it in do_mkdirat() since
inode_sgid_strip() will skip directories anyway. This will enforce the
same ordering for all relevant operations and it will make the code more
uniform and easier to understand.
> error = security_path_mknod(&path, dentry, mode, dev);
> if (error)
> goto out2;
>
> - mnt_userns = mnt_user_ns(path.mnt);
> switch (mode & S_IFMT) {
> case 0: case S_IFREG:
> error = vfs_create(mnt_userns, path.dentry->d_inode,
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
> index c75fd54b9185..f1d626697302 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
> @@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ static struct inode *ocfs2_get_init_inode(struct inode *dir, umode_t mode)
> * callers. */
> if (S_ISDIR(mode))
> set_nlink(inode, 2);
> + inode_sgid_strip(&init_user_ns, dir, &mode);
> inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
> status = dquot_initialize(inode);
> if (status)
> --
> 2.27.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-14 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-14 7:57 [PATCH v2 1/3] vfs: Add inode_sgid_strip() api Yang Xu
2022-04-14 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] vfs: strip file's S_ISGID mode on vfs instead of on underlying filesystem Yang Xu
2022-04-14 12:45 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2022-04-15 3:14 ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-04-15 9:06 ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-04-15 14:03 ` Christian Brauner
2022-04-15 14:02 ` Christian Brauner
2022-04-19 5:44 ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-04-14 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ceph: Remove S_ISGID clear code in ceph_finish_async_create Yang Xu
2022-04-14 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] vfs: Add inode_sgid_strip() api Christian Brauner
2022-04-15 1:39 ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-04-14 15:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-15 1:18 ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-04-15 1:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220414124552.4uf3hpopqa4xlwrd@wittgenstein \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).