From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@fb.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
axboe@kernel.dk, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
hch@lst.de, bvanassche@acm.org, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com,
ebiggers@kernel.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 6/6] block: relax direct io memory alignment
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 08:12:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220524061244.GF24737@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220523210119.2500150-7-kbusch@fb.com>
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 02:01:19PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> Removed iomap support for now
Do you plan to add a separate patch for it? It would be a shame to
miss it especially as you said you already tested xfs.
> + struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev);
> struct bio_vec *bv = bio->bi_io_vec + bio->bi_vcnt;
> struct page **pages = (struct page **)bv;
> ssize_t size, left;
> @@ -1219,7 +1220,19 @@ static int __bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
> BUILD_BUG_ON(PAGE_PTRS_PER_BVEC < 2);
> pages += entries_left * (PAGE_PTRS_PER_BVEC - 1);
>
> + /*
> + * Each segment in the iov is required to be a block size multiple.
> + * However, we may not be able to get the entire segment if it spans
> + * more pages than bi_max_vecs allows, so we have to ALIGN_DOWN the
> + * result to ensure the bio's total size is correct. The remainder of
> + * the iov data will be picked up in the next bio iteration.
> + *
> + * If the result is ever 0, that indicates the iov fails the segment
> + * size requirement and is an error.
> + */
> size = iov_iter_get_pages(iter, pages, LONG_MAX, nr_pages, &offset);
> + if (size > 0)
> + size = ALIGN_DOWN(size, queue_logical_block_size(q));
I think we can simply use bdev_logical_block_size here and remove the need
for the q local variable.
Given that bio_iov_iter_get_pages is used by more than the block device
direct I/O code maybe split this up further?
> @@ -42,6 +42,16 @@ static unsigned int dio_bio_write_op(struct kiocb *iocb)
> return op;
> }
>
> +static int blkdev_dio_aligned(struct block_device *bdev, loff_t pos,
> + struct iov_iter *iter)
> +{
> + if ((pos | iov_iter_count(iter)) & (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) - 1))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (iov_iter_alignment(iter) & bdev_dma_alignment(bdev))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + return 0;
> +}
I'd also split adding this helper into another prep patch to see
the actual change in behavior more easily.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-24 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-23 21:01 [PATCHv3 0/6] direct io dma alignment Keith Busch
2022-05-23 21:01 ` [PATCHv3 1/6] block/bio: remove duplicate append pages code Keith Busch
2022-05-24 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-24 6:24 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-05-24 14:17 ` Pankaj Raghav
2022-05-24 15:38 ` Keith Busch
2022-05-25 7:49 ` Pankaj Raghav
2022-05-25 8:30 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-05-25 13:37 ` Keith Busch
2022-05-25 14:25 ` Pankaj Raghav
2022-05-23 21:01 ` [PATCHv3 2/6] block: export dma_alignment attribute Keith Busch
2022-05-24 6:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-24 6:24 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-05-23 21:01 ` [PATCHv3 3/6] block: introduce bdev_dma_alignment helper Keith Busch
2022-05-24 6:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-24 6:25 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-05-23 21:01 ` [PATCHv3 4/6] block/merge: count bytes instead of sectors Keith Busch
2022-05-24 6:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-23 21:01 ` [PATCHv3 5/6] block/bounce: " Keith Busch
2022-05-24 6:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-25 14:08 ` Keith Busch
2022-05-25 14:17 ` Keith Busch
2022-05-24 14:32 ` Pankaj Raghav
2022-05-23 21:01 ` [PATCHv3 6/6] block: relax direct io memory alignment Keith Busch
2022-05-24 6:12 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-05-24 15:19 ` Pankaj Raghav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220524061244.GF24737@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@fb.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).