From: Jun <hljhnu@gmail.com>
To: namjae.jeon@samsung.com, sj1557.seo@samsung.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hljhnu@gmail.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH] exfat: optimize performance of deleting a file
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:21:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220706072117.GA29711@ubuntu> (raw)
When a large file is deleted, it's cluster bitmap is cleared.
After a bit is cleared, the buffer_head is synced.
A buffer_head can be synced many times repeatedly.
We can clear all bits first and then sync all buffer_heads.
So each buffer_head is synced only once, which significantly improves performance.
In my test, It takes about 2 minitues to delete a 5GB file without the patch.
After applying the patch, the file is deleted in almost less than 1s.
Signed-off-by: Jun <hljhnu@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I7637032db04042b8ad1ca73fe7db09d43a253255
---
fs/exfat/balloc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h | 2 ++
fs/exfat/fatent.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exfat/balloc.c b/fs/exfat/balloc.c
index 579c10f57c2b..58bdfb58bf1d 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/balloc.c
@@ -164,7 +164,6 @@ void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu)
unsigned int ent_idx;
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(sb);
- struct exfat_mount_options *opts = &sbi->options;
WARN_ON(clu < EXFAT_FIRST_CLUSTER);
ent_idx = CLUSTER_TO_BITMAP_ENT(clu);
@@ -172,7 +171,32 @@ void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu)
b = BITMAP_OFFSET_BIT_IN_SECTOR(sb, ent_idx);
clear_bit_le(b, sbi->vol_amap[i]->b_data);
- exfat_update_bh(sbi->vol_amap[i], IS_DIRSYNC(inode));
+ set_buffer_uptodate(sbi->vol_amap[i]);
+ mark_buffer_dirty(sbi->vol_amap[i]);
+}
+
+void exfat_wait_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu)
+{
+ int i;
+ unsigned int ent_idx;
+ struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
+ struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(sb);
+
+ WARN_ON(clu < EXFAT_FIRST_CLUSTER);
+ ent_idx = CLUSTER_TO_BITMAP_ENT(clu);
+ i = BITMAP_OFFSET_SECTOR_INDEX(sb, ent_idx);
+
+ if (IS_DIRSYNC(inode))
+ sync_dirty_buffer(sbi->vol_amap[i]);
+}
+
+void exfat_discard_cluster(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu)
+{
+ struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
+ struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(sb);
+ struct exfat_mount_options *opts = &sbi->options;
+
+ WARN_ON(clu < EXFAT_FIRST_CLUSTER);
if (opts->discard) {
int ret_discard;
diff --git a/fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h b/fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h
index b8f0e829ecbd..1ecd2379022d 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h
+++ b/fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h
@@ -409,6 +409,8 @@ int exfat_load_bitmap(struct super_block *sb);
void exfat_free_bitmap(struct exfat_sb_info *sbi);
int exfat_set_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu);
void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu);
+void exfat_wait_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu);
+void exfat_discard_cluster(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu);
unsigned int exfat_find_free_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int clu);
int exfat_count_used_clusters(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int *ret_count);
diff --git a/fs/exfat/fatent.c b/fs/exfat/fatent.c
index c3c9afee7418..f39a912a7da7 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/fatent.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/fatent.c
@@ -183,19 +183,56 @@ int exfat_free_cluster(struct inode *inode, struct exfat_chain *p_chain)
num_clusters++;
} while (num_clusters < p_chain->size);
+ sbi->used_clusters -= num_clusters;
+
+ clu = p_chain->dir;
+ num_clusters = 0;
+ do {
+ exfat_wait_bitmap(inode, clu);
+ clu++;
+
+ num_clusters++;
+ } while (num_clusters < p_chain->size);
+
+ clu = p_chain->dir;
+ num_clusters = 0;
+ do {
+ exfat_discard_cluster(inode, clu);
+ clu++;
+
+ num_clusters++;
+ } while (num_clusters < p_chain->size);
+
} else {
do {
exfat_clear_bitmap(inode, clu);
if (exfat_get_next_cluster(sb, &clu))
- goto dec_used_clus;
+ goto exit;
+
+ sbi->used_clusters--;
+ } while (clu != EXFAT_EOF_CLUSTER);
+
+ clu = p_chain->dir;
+ do {
+ exfat_wait_bitmap(inode, clu);
+
+ if (exfat_get_next_cluster(sb, &clu))
+ goto exit;
+
+ } while (clu != EXFAT_EOF_CLUSTER);
+
+ clu = p_chain->dir;
+ do {
+ exfat_discard_cluster(inode, clu);
+
+ if (exfat_get_next_cluster(sb, &clu))
+ goto exit;
- num_clusters++;
} while (clu != EXFAT_EOF_CLUSTER);
}
-dec_used_clus:
- sbi->used_clusters -= num_clusters;
+exit:
return 0;
}
--
2.36.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-07-06 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20220706072124epcas1p42f5e7b4bde0cdb4d0fb80ac5ea18158a@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2022-07-06 7:21 ` Jun [this message]
2022-07-06 15:05 ` [RFC PATCH] exfat: optimize performance of deleting a file Sungjong Seo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220706072117.GA29711@ubuntu \
--to=hljhnu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namjae.jeon@samsung.com \
--cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).