From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, jlayton@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ebiggers@kernel.org,
david@fromorbit.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] fs: record I_DIRTY_TIME even if inode already has I_DIRTY_INODE
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 14:37:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220812123727.46397-2-lczerner@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220812123727.46397-1-lczerner@redhat.com>
Currently the I_DIRTY_TIME will never get set if the inode already has
I_DIRTY_INODE with assumption that it supersedes I_DIRTY_TIME. That's
true, however ext4 will only update the on-disk inode in
->dirty_inode(), not on actual writeback. As a result if the inode
already has I_DIRTY_INODE state by the time we get to
__mark_inode_dirty() only with I_DIRTY_TIME, the time was already filled
into on-disk inode and will not get updated until the next I_DIRTY_INODE
update, which might never come if we crash or get a power failure.
The problem can be reproduced on ext4 by running xfstest generic/622
with -o iversion mount option.
Fix it by allowing I_DIRTY_TIME to be set even if the inode already has
I_DIRTY_INODE. Also make sure that the case is properly handled in
writeback_single_inode() as well. Additionally changes in
xfs_fs_dirty_inode() was made to accommodate for I_DIRTY_TIME in flag.
Thanks Jan Kara for suggestions on how to make this work properly.
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
v2: Reworked according to suggestions from Jan
v3: Update documentation, add comments, change flag to flags in
xfs_fs_dirty_inode()
Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst | 2 ++
fs/fs-writeback.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 12 +++++++++--
include/linux/fs.h | 9 ++++----
4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
index 6cd6953e175b..5d72b6ba4e63 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
@@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ or bottom half).
This is specifically for the inode itself being marked dirty,
not its data. If the update needs to be persisted by fdatasync(),
then I_DIRTY_DATASYNC will be set in the flags argument.
+ If the inode has dirty timestamp and lazytime is enabled
+ I_DIRTY_TIME will be set in the flags.
``write_inode``
this method is called when the VFS needs to write an inode to
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 05221366a16d..638dbf143727 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -1718,9 +1718,14 @@ static int writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
*/
if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_ALL))
inode_cgwb_move_to_attached(inode, wb);
- else if (!(inode->i_state & I_SYNC_QUEUED) &&
- (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY))
- redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb);
+ else if (!(inode->i_state & I_SYNC_QUEUED)) {
+ if ((inode->i_state & I_DIRTY))
+ redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb);
+ else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) {
+ inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
+ inode_io_list_move_locked(inode, wb, &wb->b_dirty_time);
+ }
+ }
spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
inode_sync_complete(inode);
@@ -2369,6 +2374,17 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
trace_writeback_mark_inode_dirty(inode, flags);
if (flags & I_DIRTY_INODE) {
+
+ /* Inode timestamp update will piggback on this dirtying */
+ if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) {
+ spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+ if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) {
+ inode->i_state &= ~I_DIRTY_TIME;
+ flags |= I_DIRTY_TIME;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ }
+
/*
* Notify the filesystem about the inode being dirtied, so that
* (if needed) it can update on-disk fields and journal the
@@ -2378,7 +2394,8 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
*/
trace_writeback_dirty_inode_start(inode, flags);
if (sb->s_op->dirty_inode)
- sb->s_op->dirty_inode(inode, flags & I_DIRTY_INODE);
+ sb->s_op->dirty_inode(inode,
+ flags & (I_DIRTY_INODE | I_DIRTY_TIME));
trace_writeback_dirty_inode(inode, flags);
/* I_DIRTY_INODE supersedes I_DIRTY_TIME. */
@@ -2399,21 +2416,15 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
*/
smp_mb();
- if (((inode->i_state & flags) == flags) ||
- (dirtytime && (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_INODE)))
+ if ((inode->i_state & flags) == flags)
return;
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
- if (dirtytime && (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_INODE))
- goto out_unlock_inode;
if ((inode->i_state & flags) != flags) {
const int was_dirty = inode->i_state & I_DIRTY;
inode_attach_wb(inode, NULL);
- /* I_DIRTY_INODE supersedes I_DIRTY_TIME. */
- if (flags & I_DIRTY_INODE)
- inode->i_state &= ~I_DIRTY_TIME;
inode->i_state |= flags;
/*
@@ -2486,7 +2497,6 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
out_unlock:
if (wb)
spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
-out_unlock_inode:
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__mark_inode_dirty);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
index 9ac59814bbb6..13efc77a1e79 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ xfs_fs_destroy_inode(
static void
xfs_fs_dirty_inode(
struct inode *inode,
- int flag)
+ int flags)
{
struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode);
struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
@@ -661,7 +661,15 @@ xfs_fs_dirty_inode(
if (!(inode->i_sb->s_flags & SB_LAZYTIME))
return;
- if (flag != I_DIRTY_SYNC || !(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME))
+
+ /*
+ * Only do the timestamp update if the inode is dirty (I_DIRTY_SYNC)
+ * and has dirty timestamp (I_DIRTY_TIME). I_DIRTY_TIME can be either
+ * already set in i_state, or passed in flags possibly together with
+ * I_DIRTY_SYNC.
+ */
+ if ((flags & ~I_DIRTY_TIME) != I_DIRTY_SYNC ||
+ !((inode->i_state | flags) & I_DIRTY_TIME))
return;
if (xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_fsyncts, 0, 0, 0, &tp))
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 5113f65c786f..e220d26d771a 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2376,13 +2376,14 @@ static inline void kiocb_clone(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct kiocb *kiocb_src,
* don't have to write inode on fdatasync() when only
* e.g. the timestamps have changed.
* I_DIRTY_PAGES Inode has dirty pages. Inode itself may be clean.
- * I_DIRTY_TIME The inode itself only has dirty timestamps, and the
+ * I_DIRTY_TIME The inode itself has dirty timestamps, and the
* lazytime mount option is enabled. We keep track of this
* separately from I_DIRTY_SYNC in order to implement
* lazytime. This gets cleared if I_DIRTY_INODE
- * (I_DIRTY_SYNC and/or I_DIRTY_DATASYNC) gets set. I.e.
- * either I_DIRTY_TIME *or* I_DIRTY_INODE can be set in
- * i_state, but not both. I_DIRTY_PAGES may still be set.
+ * (I_DIRTY_SYNC and/or I_DIRTY_DATASYNC) gets set. But
+ * I_DIRTY_TIME can still be set if I_DIRTY_SYNC is already
+ * in place because writeback might already be in progress
+ * and we don't want to lose the time update
* I_NEW Serves as both a mutex and completion notification.
* New inodes set I_NEW. If two processes both create
* the same inode, one of them will release its inode and
--
2.37.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-12 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-12 12:37 [PATCH v3 1/3] ext4: don't increase iversion counter for ea_inodes Lukas Czerner
2022-08-12 12:37 ` Lukas Czerner [this message]
2022-08-12 18:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] fs: record I_DIRTY_TIME even if inode already has I_DIRTY_INODE Eric Biggers
2022-08-12 18:12 ` Eric Biggers
2022-08-16 11:21 ` Jan Kara
2022-08-21 6:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-22 8:33 ` Jan Kara
2022-08-12 18:42 ` Eric Biggers
2022-08-16 11:41 ` Jan Kara
2022-08-12 12:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ext4: unconditionally enable the i_version counter Lukas Czerner
2022-08-12 13:05 ` Christian Brauner
2022-08-16 11:48 ` Jan Kara
2022-08-12 13:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ext4: don't increase iversion counter for ea_inodes Christian Brauner
2022-08-12 18:42 ` Jeff Layton
2022-08-16 11:52 ` Jan Kara
2022-08-16 12:18 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220812123727.46397-2-lczerner@redhat.com \
--to=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).