From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"Konstantin Meskhidze" <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>,
"Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/4] landlock: Document Landlock's file truncation support
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:30:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220817203006.21769-5-gnoack3000@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220817203006.21769-1-gnoack3000@gmail.com>
Use the LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE flag in the tutorial.
Adapt the backwards compatibility example and discussion to remove the
truncation flag where needed.
Point out potential surprising behaviour related to truncate.
Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
index b8ea59493964..5c10872cb795 100644
--- a/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
+++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
@@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ the need to be explicit about the denied-by-default access rights.
LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_FIFO |
LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_BLOCK |
LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SYM |
- LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER,
+ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER |
+ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE,
};
Because we may not know on which kernel version an application will be
@@ -69,16 +70,26 @@ should try to protect users as much as possible whatever the kernel they are
using. To avoid binary enforcement (i.e. either all security features or
none), we can leverage a dedicated Landlock command to get the current version
of the Landlock ABI and adapt the handled accesses. Let's check if we should
-remove the `LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER` access right which is only supported
-starting with the second version of the ABI.
+remove the `LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER` or `LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE` access
+rights, which are only supported starting with the second and third version of
+the ABI.
.. code-block:: c
int abi;
abi = landlock_create_ruleset(NULL, 0, LANDLOCK_CREATE_RULESET_VERSION);
- if (abi < 2) {
- ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs &= ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER;
+ switch (abi) {
+ case -1:
+ perror("The running kernel does not enable to use Landlock");
+ return 1;
+ case 1:
+ /* Removes LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER for ABI < 2 */
+ ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs &= ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER;
+ __attribute__((fallthrough));
+ case 2:
+ /* Removes LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE for ABI < 3 */
+ ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs &= ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE;
}
This enables to create an inclusive ruleset that will contain our rules.
@@ -127,8 +138,8 @@ descriptor.
It may also be required to create rules following the same logic as explained
for the ruleset creation, by filtering access rights according to the Landlock
-ABI version. In this example, this is not required because
-`LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER` is not allowed by any rule.
+ABI version. In this example, this is not required because all of the requested
+``allowed_access`` rights are already available in ABI 1.
We now have a ruleset with one rule allowing read access to ``/usr`` while
denying all other handled accesses for the filesystem. The next step is to
@@ -251,6 +262,24 @@ To be allowed to use :manpage:`ptrace(2)` and related syscalls on a target
process, a sandboxed process should have a subset of the target process rules,
which means the tracee must be in a sub-domain of the tracer.
+Truncating files
+----------------
+
+The operations covered by `LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE` and
+`LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE` both change the contents of a file and sometimes
+overlap in non-intuitive ways. It is recommended to always specify both of
+these together.
+
+A particularly surprising example is :manpage:`creat(2)`. The name suggests
+that this system call requires the rights to create and write files. However,
+it also requires the truncate right if an existing file under the same name is
+already present.
+
+It should also be noted that truncating files does not require the
+`LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE` right. Apart from the :manpage:`truncate(2)`
+system call, this can also be done through :manpage:`open(2)` with the flags
+`O_RDONLY | O_TRUNC`.
+
Compatibility
=============
@@ -397,6 +426,15 @@ Starting with the Landlock ABI version 2, it is now possible to securely
control renaming and linking thanks to the new `LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER`
access right.
+File truncation (ABI < 3)
+-------------------------
+
+File truncation could not be denied before the third Landlock ABI, so it is
+always allowed when using a kernel that only supports the first or second ABI.
+
+Starting with the Landlock ABI version 3, it is now possible to securely control
+truncation thanks to the new `LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE` access right.
+
.. _kernel_support:
Kernel support
--
2.37.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-17 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-17 20:30 [PATCH v5 0/4] landlock: truncate support Günther Noack
2022-08-17 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] landlock: Support file truncation Günther Noack
2022-08-17 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] selftests/landlock: Selftests for file truncation support Günther Noack
2022-08-18 20:39 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-08-19 5:24 ` Günther Noack
2022-08-19 8:15 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-08-19 8:36 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-08-19 8:55 ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)
2022-08-19 9:14 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-08-20 9:38 ` Günther Noack
2022-08-17 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] samples/landlock: Extend sample tool to support LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE Günther Noack
2022-08-17 20:30 ` Günther Noack [this message]
2022-09-01 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] landlock: truncate support Mickaël Salaün
2022-09-02 5:32 ` Günther Noack
2022-09-02 6:16 ` Günther Noack
2022-09-02 8:40 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-09-02 16:34 ` Günther Noack
2022-09-03 12:02 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-09-02 12:26 ` xiujianfeng
2022-09-02 13:12 ` Mickaël Salaün
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220817203006.21769-5-gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--to=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).