From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56847C6FA89 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 06:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237022AbiIEG4B (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 02:56:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52554 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234831AbiIEGzm (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 02:55:42 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7A1622BD0; Sun, 4 Sep 2022 23:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id DC54F68AFE; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 08:55:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 08:55:23 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Damien Le Moal Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba , Damien Le Moal , Naohiro Aota , Johannes Thumshirn , Qu Wenruo , Jens Axboe , "Darrick J. Wong" , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/17] btrfs: split zone append bios in btrfs_submit_bio Message-ID: <20220905065523.GI2092@lst.de> References: <20220901074216.1849941-1-hch@lst.de> <20220901074216.1849941-17-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 10:46:13AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: > On 9/1/22 16:42, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The current btrfs zoned device support is a little cumbersome in the data > > I/O path as it requires the callers to not support more I/O than the > > supported ZONE_APPEND size by the underlying device. This leads to a lot > > Did you mean: "...as it requires the callers to not issue I/O larger than > the supported ZONE_APPEND size for the underlying device." ? > I think you do mean that :) Yes.