linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	jack@suse.com, tytso@mit.edu, brauner@kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] quota: Check next/prev free block number after reading from quota file
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 13:39:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220922113902.rhoxfgdzcvdzo3wc@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41578612-d582-79ea-bb8e-89fa19d4406e@huawei.com>

On Thu 22-09-22 16:13:59, Zhihao Cheng wrote:
> 在 2022/9/21 21:37, Jan Kara 写道:
> > > --- a/fs/quota/quota_tree.c
> > > +++ b/fs/quota/quota_tree.c
> > > @@ -71,6 +71,35 @@ static ssize_t write_blk(struct qtree_mem_dqinfo *info, uint blk, char *buf)
> > >   	return ret;
> > >   }
> > > +static inline int do_check_range(struct super_block *sb, uint val, uint max_val)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (val >= max_val) {
> > > +		quota_error(sb, "Getting block too big (%u >= %u)",
> > > +			    val, max_val);
> > > +		return -EUCLEAN;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > 
> > I'd already provide min_val and the string for the message here as well (as
> > you do in patch 2). It is less churn in the next patch and free blocks
> > checking actually needs that as well. See below.
> > 
> > > +
> > > +static int check_free_block(struct qtree_mem_dqinfo *info,
> > > +			    struct qt_disk_dqdbheader *dh)
> > > +{
> > > +	int err = 0;
> > > +	uint nextblk, prevblk;
> > > +
> > > +	nextblk = le32_to_cpu(dh->dqdh_next_free);
> > > +	err = do_check_range(info->dqi_sb, nextblk, info->dqi_blocks);
> > > +	if (err)
> > > +		return err;
> > > +	prevblk = le32_to_cpu(dh->dqdh_prev_free);
> > > +	err = do_check_range(info->dqi_sb, prevblk, info->dqi_blocks);
> > > +	if (err)
> > > +		return err;
> > 
> > The free block should actually be > QT_TREEOFF so I'd add the check to
> > do_check_range().
> 
> 'dh->dqdh_next_free' may be updated when quota entry removed,
> 'dh->dqdh_next_free' can be used for next new quota entris.
> Before sending v2, I found 'dh->dqdh_next_free' and 'dh->dqdh_prev_free' can
> easily be zero in newly allocated blocks when continually creating files
> onwed by different users:
> find_free_dqentry
>   get_free_dqblk
>     write_blk(info, info->dqi_blocks, buf)  // zero'd qt_disk_dqdbheader
>     blk = info->dqi_blocks++   // allocate new one block
>   info->dqi_free_entry = blk   // will be used for new quota entries
> 
> find_free_dqentry
>   if (info->dqi_free_entry)
>     blk = info->dqi_free_entry
>     read_blk(info, blk, buf)   // dh->dqdh_next_free = dh->dqdh_prev_free =
> 0
> 
> I think it's normal when 'dh->dqdh_next_free' or 'dh->dqdh_prev_free' equals
> to 0.

Good point! 0 means "not present". So any block number (either in free list
or pointed from the quota tree) should be either 0 or > QT_TREEOFF.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-22 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-20 11:05 [PATCH 0/3] Check content after reading from quota file Zhihao Cheng
2022-08-20 11:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] quota: Check next/prev free block number " Zhihao Cheng
2022-09-21 13:37   ` Jan Kara
2022-09-22  8:13     ` Zhihao Cheng
2022-09-22 11:39       ` Jan Kara [this message]
2022-09-22 12:58         ` Zhihao Cheng
2022-08-20 11:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] quota: Replace all block number checking with helper function Zhihao Cheng
2022-08-20 11:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] quota: Add more checking after reading from quota file Zhihao Cheng
2022-09-13  1:16 ` [PATCH 0/3] Check content " Zhihao Cheng
2022-09-21  7:39   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220922113902.rhoxfgdzcvdzo3wc@quack3 \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).